Bianucci Law Firm
Analysis of Judgment No. 1283 of 2024: Restoration of the Deadline for Appeal.

Let’s explore the recent ruling of the Court of Appeal of Naples regarding the restoration of the term for appeal, in light of the new regulatory provisions introduced by Legislative Decree No. 150 of 2022.

Bianucci Law Firm
Commentary on Judgment No. 604 of 2024: Precautionary Measures and Registration in the Criminal Record.

Let's analyze the recent ruling no. 604 of 2024, which clarifies the legitimacy of precautionary measures even in the absence of registration in the criminal record, highlighting the legal and practical implications.

Bianucci Law Firm
Commentary on Judgment No. 614 of 2024: Extradition and Precautionary Measures

Analysis of the recent ruling by the Court of Appeal of Rome regarding precautionary measures in the context of extradition, focusing on the legitimacy of the suspension of coercive measures for internal justice needs.

Bianucci Law Firm
Analysis of Judgment No. 1919 of 2024: Appeal and Obligation of Specific Statement of Reasons.

Ruling no. 1919 of 2024 clarifies the importance of specificity in the grounds for appeal, highlighting how the lack of details can compromise the right to defense and the judge's assessment.

Bianucci Law Firm
Commentary on Judgment No. 3096 of 2024: Online Fraud and Impaired Defense.

Analysis of ruling no. 3096 of 2024 clarifying the conditions for the aggravating factor of diminished defense in online fraud, highlighting the vulnerability of buyers in verifying products and sellers.

Bianucci Law Firm
Disclosure of official secrets: commentary on Judgment No. 3755 of 2024

The ruling no. 3755 of 2024 clarifies the dynamics of liability in the disclosure of office secrets, addressing the figure of the extraneus and its legal implications.

Bianucci Law Firm
Judgment No. 3079 of 2024: Offense Against a Public Official and Requirement of Presence

Let’s analyze the recent ruling No. 3079 of 2024, which clarifies the concept of 'presence' in the crime of insulting a public official, highlighting the importance of physicality in the legal context.

Bianucci Law Firm
Ruling No. 2714 of 2024: The Right to Translation in Personal Protective Measures.

Analysis of ruling no. 2714/2024 concerning late translation in precautionary measures and its impact on the defense rights of the foreign-language defendant.

Bianucci Law Firm
Analysis of Judgment No. 3892 of 2025: Precautionary Measures and Urgent Removal

In this article, we analyze ruling no. 3892 of 2025, highlighting the legal principles concerning urgent removal from the family home and the judge's oversight in validating precautionary measures.

Bianucci Law Firm
Commentary on Judgment No. 1675 of 2024: Mitigating Circumstances in Kidnapping.

The ruling no. 1675 of 2024 by the Court of Assize of Appeal of Rome clarifies the conditions for recognizing mitigating circumstances in the crime of kidnapping for extortion purposes. An in-depth analysis to understand the useful contribution to the truth process.