Bianucci Law Firm
Analysis of Judgment No. 3356 of 2024: Chamber Proceedings and Appeals During Covid-19.

The ruling of the Court of Appeal of Catania provides important insights into the management of criminal proceedings during the pandemic emergency, clarifying the implications of the request for oral proceedings and the obligation of translation for detained defendants.

Bianucci Law Firm
Comment on ruling no. 131 of 2024: restorative justice and reasoning in the appeal to the Court of Cassation.

Let's analyze ruling no. 131 of 2024, which clarifies the admissibility of requests for access to restorative justice programs and the limits of the defect in motivation in the appeal to the Court of Cassation.

Bianucci Law Firm
Judgment No. 3015 of 2024: False Certification for Meetings with Prisoners

Let’s analyze the recent ruling no. 3015 of 2024 concerning false certification regarding criminal records for requests for meetings with inmates, highlighting the legal principles and implications.

Bianucci Law Firm
Videoconference and Nullity of the Judgment: Analysis of Judgment No. 1527 of 2024

The recent ruling of the Court of Appeal of Reggio Calabria clarifies that the defendant's absence during the reading of the decision via videoconference does not result in the nullity of the sentence. Let's explore the details and legal implications.

Bianucci Law Firm
Fraudulent Bankruptcy: Commentary on Judgment No. 3033 of 2024

The ruling no. 3033 of 2024 by the Court of Benevento clarifies the inadmissibility of the appeal against the preventive seizure of assets in the absence of a concrete interest on the part of the accused.

Bianucci Law Firm
Commentary on Judgment No. 3016/2024: Failure to Maintain Financial Statements and Simple Bankruptcy

The recent ruling of the Court of Appeal of L'Aquila clarifies the importance of maintaining accounting records even in the case of liquidation and the criminal consequences for non-compliant liquidators.

Bianucci Law Firm
Analysis of Judgment No. 2910 of 2024: Inadmissibility and Justification of the Appeal.

Explore the recent ruling no. 2910 of 2024 that clarifies the inadmissibility of grounds in a criminal appeal and its legal implications. Discover how additional grounds can influence the final decision.

Bianucci Law Firm
Commentary on Judgment No. 2124 of 2024: Corruption in Judicial Acts and the Role of the Public Official

Let's analyze the recent ruling no. 2124 of 2024, which clarifies the necessary requirements to constitute the crime of corruption in judicial acts and the crucial role of the public official in the process. Let’s discover the details and legal implications together.

Bianucci Law Firm
Commentary on Judgment No. 4170 of 2024: Precautionary Appeals and Return of Seized Assets

Analysis of the recent ruling no. 4170 of 2024 concerning real precautionary appeals and third-party rights regarding the return of seized assets, with a focus on ownership and availability of the assets.

Bianucci Law Firm
Judgment No. 2772 of 2024: The Reasoning in Judgments and the Role of Wiretaps.

Analysis of ruling no. 2772 of 2024, which clarifies the requirements of reasoning in criminal judgments, with particular reference to the use of telephone interceptions. An in-depth look at the principles of clarity and linearity in the reasoning of evidence.