Bianucci Law Firm
Analysis of Judgment No. 39546 of 2024: Embezzlement and Public Interest

The recent ruling of the Court of Cassation clarifies the conditions for the integration of the crime of misuse of public funds by public officials, highlighting the distinction between public and private interest.

Bianucci Law Firm
Commentary on Judgment No. 37350 of 2024: Importation of Drugs and Requirements for the Commission of the Offense.

Analysis of ruling no. 37350 of 2024 clarifying the requirements for the completion of the crime of importing narcotic substances, highlighting the importance of the material availability of the substance and the control of transfer operations.

Bianucci Law Firm
Judgment No. 38600 of 2024: the meaning of the qualification of public service officer.

Ruling no. 38600 of 2024 clarifies the criteria for the qualification of public service appointee, excluding public employees who perform only executive tasks. A thorough analysis of the decision and its legal implications.

Bianucci Law Firm
Commentary on Judgment No. 38605 of 2024: Extradition and Precautionary Measures

Analysis of judgment no. 38605 of 2024 regarding extradition, highlighting the importance of assessing the grounds for refusal under Article 714, paragraph 3, of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

Bianucci Law Firm
Commentary on Judgment No. 39680 of 2024: Preventive Seizures and Protection of Third Creditors.

Analysis of the recent ruling No. 39680 of 2024, which clarifies the methods of verifying third-party claims in relation to preventive seizures, in light of legislative changes and the principle of good faith.

Bianucci Law Firm
Judgment No. 37635 of 2024: The Recusal of the Judge in Case of Different Facts.

The recent ruling of the Court of Appeal of Reggio Calabria provides important clarifications on the disqualification of a judge when judging the same defendant for different facts. Let's explore the details and legal implications.

Bianucci Law Firm
Inadmissibility of WhatsApp Messages: Analysis of Judgment No. 39548 of 2024

The ruling of the Court of Cassation in 2024 clarifies the limits on the acquisition of WhatsApp messages by the judicial police, highlighting the need for a seizure warrant to ensure their validity as evidence.

Bianucci Law Firm
Analysis of Judgment No. 40174 of 2024: The Role of the Bankruptcy Trustee and the Refusal of Official Acts.

The ruling of the Court of Cassation No. 40174 of 2024 clarifies the limits of the bankruptcy trustee's liability, distinguishing between delay and refusal of official acts. Let us explore the necessary conditions to configure the offense.

Bianucci Law Firm
Commentary on Judgment No. 40177 of 2024: Inadmissibility of the Public Prosecutor's Appeal to the Supreme Court.

Judgment no. 40177 of 2024 examines the issue of the inadmissibility of the appeal to the Court of Cassation filed by the public prosecutor in the case of abnormal acts, delving into the concept of interest in appealing.

Bianucci Law Firm
Commentary on Judgment No. 37745 of 2024: Admissibility of Complaint and Damage.

Analysis of ruling no. 37745 of 2024 addressing the issue of prosecutability upon complaint in relation to property damage offenses, highlighting the legal and practical implications for citizens and legal practitioners.