Bianucci Law Firm
Judgment No. 15153/2022: The Right of Prisoners to Send Postal Packages

The recent ruling clarified that, under the prison regime pursuant to Article 41-bis, there is no subjective right for inmates to send postal packages. Let us analyze the legal implications of this decision.

Bianucci Law Firm
Sentence No. 17496 of 2022: Impunity and Intent in Cases of Partial Mental Defect.

An analysis of the ruling that clarifies the relationship between culpability and guilt, with particular reference to intent in situations of personality disorders and chronic alcoholism, in light of Italian case law.

Bianucci Law Firm
Commentary on Judgment No. 17494 of 2022: Fraud and Devastation in Criminal Law.

Let's analyze ruling no. 17494 of 2022, which clarifies the concept of intent in the crime of devastation, highlighting the necessary requirements for its configurability and the legal implications.

Bianucci Law Firm
Analysis of Judgment No. 14792 of 2022: New Evidence in Criminal Review

Discover how the recent ruling No. 14792 of 2022 has redefined the concept of new evidence in criminal review, highlighting the importance of civil judgments in the criminal process.

Bianucci Law Firm
Comment on Judgment No. 17029 of 2022: Usury and Concurrence of Persons.

Analysis of Judgment No. 17029 of 2022 of the Court of Cassation regarding the participation of individuals in the crime of usury and the legal implications for the agents involved in the recovery of usurious debts.

Bianucci Law Firm
Ruling No. 16822 of 2022: House Arrest and Late Request in Hearing

Analysis of judgment no. 16822 of 2022, which clarifies the possibility of requesting home detention as an alternative to probation and the necessary legal conditions.

Bianucci Law Firm
Analysis of Judgment No. 15625 of 2023: Continuation of Offenses and Burden of the Judge.

Judgment no. 15625 of 2023 provides important insights on the assessment of ongoing offenses, highlighting the need for a thorough analysis by the judge, even in the presence of a wide time span.

Bianucci Law Firm
Analysis of Ruling No. 15396 of 2023: Suspension of Special Surveillance and Social Dangerousness.

This ruling clarifies the conditions for the suspension of special surveillance in the event of serving a prison sentence, highlighting the importance of reassessing social dangerousness.

Bianucci Law Firm
Commentary on Judgment No. 15636 of 2023: The Importance of Contradictory in the Confiscation Revocation Procedure.

Judgment No. 15636 of 2023 clarifies that the opposition to the order rejecting the request for revocation in matters of confiscation must respect the adversarial principle, under penalty of nullity of the provision. An analysis of the legal and practical implications of this ruling.

Bianucci Law Firm
Commentary on Judgment No. 15635 of 2023: European Arrest Warrant and the Principle of Specialty

The recent ruling of the Court of Cassation clarifies the application of the principle of specialty in the context of the European Arrest Warrant, excluding its applicability in cases of confiscation. Let’s explore the details and legal implications of this ruling.