The recent judgment No. 37350 of July 10, 2024, issued by the Court of Cassation, provides important insights into the necessary requirements for the commission of the crime of importation of narcotic substances. In a complex legal context, the Court clarified that the mere conclusion of an agreement between buyer and seller is not sufficient to constitute the offense; concrete availability of the substance and control over transportation and introduction operations into the national territory are required.
The decision falls within the realm of Italian criminal law, particularly regarding the regulation of narcotic substances. Article 73 of the Presidential Decree of October 9, 1990, No. 309, establishes the rules concerning the importation and trafficking of prohibited substances, while Article 56 of the Penal Code defines the concepts of attempt and commission of the offense. The Court, recalling previous case law, reiterated that it is necessary to demonstrate not only the intention to import but also the actual availability of the substance.
Importation - Commission of the offense - Conclusion of the agreement between buyer and seller - Sufficiency - Exclusion - Availability of the narcotic and control of transfer activities - Necessity. For the commission of the crime of importation of narcotic substances, the mere conclusion of an agreement between buyer and seller aimed at importation is not sufficient; it is necessary for the agent to achieve actual availability, even abroad, of the substance and control the subsequent operations aimed at transporting and introducing it into the national territory.
The Court highlighted several fundamental aspects for the configuration of the crime of importation:
Judgment No. 37350 of 2024 represents an important milestone in defining the requirements for the commission of the crime of importation of narcotic substances. It emphasizes the necessity of a rigorous and concrete approach in evaluating illegal conduct, highlighting how the mere intention to import cannot be considered sufficient. This jurisprudential orientation not only clarifies the responsibilities of the defendants but also provides insights for the fight against drug trafficking, drawing attention to the need for effective control of transfer operations.