Bianucci Law Firm
Medical liability and damage from unwanted birth: commentary on order no. 1903 of 2025.

The ruling of the Supreme Court clarifies the prerequisites for civil liability in the event of harm from unwanted birth, delving into the role of medical information and the burden of proof.

Bianucci Law Firm
Commentary on ruling no. 1469 of 2025: Uncovered risks and non-operability of the policy.

Analysis of the recent Order No. 1469 of 2025 that clarifies the implications of risk limitation clauses in insurance policies. Discover how this ruling affects the liability of insurance companies.

Bianucci Law Firm
Analysis of Judgment No. 931 of 2025: Presumption of Driver's Liability in Case of Pedestrian Accident.

We explore ruling no. 931 of 2025, which clarifies the limits of the presumption of driver liability in the event of traffic accidents, highlighting the importance of assessing the circumstances in which the incident occurs.

Bianucci Law Firm
Compensation for damage due to loss of family relationship: commentary on Ordinance No. 761 of 2025.

Order No. 761 of 2025 by the Court of Cassation clarifies the motivational criteria for the assessment of damages due to the loss of parental relationship, highlighting the importance of transparency in calculating compensatory amounts.

Bianucci Law Firm
Analysis of Judgment No. 575 of 2025: Territorial Jurisdiction and Responsibility of Judges

The recent Order No. 575 of 2025 clarifies the rules of territorial jurisdiction in cases of civil liability of magistrates, highlighting the distinction between intentional and negligent behaviors, and the related legal implications.

Bianucci Law Firm
Analysis of Judgment No. 573 of 2025: The Loan for Use Contract and Family Cohabitation

The recent ordinance of the Court of Appeal of Turin offers important insights into the regulation of the loan for use contract, particularly regarding its duration and the conditions of use by the borrower.

Bianucci Law Firm
Transfusion damage: commentary on ordinance no. 535 of 2025

The ordinance of the Court of Cassation clarifies the absence of obligation for the Ministry of Health to accept settlement proposals in cases of transfusion damage, highlighting the need for specific forms and procedures.

Bianucci Law Firm
Commentary on Judgment No. 525 of 2025: The Power of the Judge and Civil Evidence

Analysis of the recent ruling by the Court of Cassation regarding the judge's power to request information from the public administration, focusing on liability for damages from blood transfusions.

Bianucci Law Firm
Interpretation of Contracts: Commentary on Order No. 353 of 2025

The order highlights the importance of contractual interpretation by the trial judge and the limits of appeal to the Supreme Court, clarifying how criticisms of interpretation must be specific and justified.

Bianucci Law Firm
Assisted negotiation and inadmissibility: analysis of Ordinance No. 186 of 2025

Exploring the important ordinance that clarifies the condition of admissibility in the context of assisted negotiation for road traffic damage claims and payment requests. An in-depth and accessible analysis.