Bianucci Law Firm
Commentary on Judgment No. 39155 of 2024: Repeal and Succession of Criminal Laws

Let's analyze ruling no. 39155 of 2024, which clarifies the distinction between the repeal of a crime and the succession of criminal laws, providing important insights on the themes of crime and legality.

Bianucci Law Firm
Judgment No. 39489 of 2024: The Revocation of the Renewal of Evidence and Its Conditions

The recent ruling of the Court of Cassation clarifies the criteria for the revocation of the renewal of evidence, highlighting the importance of a coherent and detailed rationale from the appellate judge.

Bianucci Law Firm
Commentary on Judgment No. 38802 of 2024: Specific Intent of Evasion and Omission of Declaration.

Let’s analyze ruling no. 38802 of 2024, which clarifies the requirements for establishing the specific intent of tax evasion in the crime of failure to declare, providing useful insights for understanding tax liability.

Bianucci Law Firm
Analysis of ruling no. 39603 of 2024: legal continuity regarding the damage of cultural heritage.

The ruling no. 39603 of 2024 provides important clarifications on the regulatory continuity regarding the damage to cultural heritage, highlighting the existence of different offenses and their specific cases. Let’s explore together the meaning of this ruling.

Bianucci Law Firm
Analysis of Judgment No. 39602 of 2024: Demolition Order and Sanctioning Measures.

The ruling of the Court of Appeal of Naples clarifies the non-obstruction of the demolition order of illegal structures, even in the presence of amnesty provisions issued to non-owners. Let’s discover the details and legal implications.

Bianucci Law Firm
Preventive Seizure and Defense Office: Commentary on Judgment No. 38890 of 2024

The ruling no. 38890 of 2024 clarifies the requirements for the execution of preventive seizure against an entity, analyzing the necessity of appointing a public defender and the notice of guarantee.

Bianucci Law Firm
Analysis of Judgment No. 37849 of 2024 on Social Dangerousness and Preventive Measures.

The recent ruling of the Court of Appeal of Turin provides important insights on the assessment of social dangerousness, highlighting how pending criminal proceedings can influence preventive measures. Let's learn more about this crucial issue.

Bianucci Law Firm
Seizure of evidence and privacy: commentary on ruling no. 37409 of 2024

The recent ruling no. 37409 of 2024 analyzes the methods of evidence seizure of electronic devices, the return of forensic copies, and the protection of personal data. Let's explore the legal and practical implications of this decision together.

Bianucci Law Firm
Commentary on Judgment No. 40272 of 2024 on Usury: Clarifications on the Determination of the Rate.

The ruling no. 40272 of 2024 by the Court of Cassation clarifies how tax and fiscal effects should not be considered in the calculation of the usurious interest rate, outlining important principles for the jurisprudence on the issue of usury.

Bianucci Law Firm
Analysis of Judgment No. 37395 of 2024: Relevance of GPS Localization in Preliminary Investigations

The ruling of the Court of Cassation of September 18, 2024 clarifies the use of GPS satellite localization as an atypical means of evidence, excluding the application of 'data retention' regulations. An essential analysis to understand the boundaries between privacy and investigative needs.