Bianucci Law Firm
Judgment No. 46979 of 2024: Lessons on Personal Injuries and Aggravating Circumstances

Let's analyze the recent ruling no. 46979 of 2024 by the Court of Cassation, which clarifies the conditions for contesting aggravating circumstances in the crime of intentional bodily harm, with particular attention to cases of stalking.

Bianucci Law Firm
Commentary on Judgment No. 45583 of 2024: Substitute Penalties and Conditional Suspension.

Analysis of ruling no. 45583 of 2024 regarding alternative penalties and conditional suspension of the sentence, highlighting legislative innovations and their impact on defendants' rights.

Bianucci Law Firm
The legitimacy of the delegated European Prosecutor: analysis of ruling no. 45407 of 2024.

Judgment no. 45407 of 2024 clarifies the role of the delegated European Prosecutor in the context of appeals, establishing their standing to file appeals to the Court of Cassation. A thorough analysis of the reasoning and legal implications.

Bianucci Law Firm
Employer Liability: Analysis of Judgment No. 45398 of 2024

Let's explore the recent ruling no. 45398 of 2024, which clarifies the employer's liability in the case of workplace injuries related to evasive practices. An analysis of the legal implications and safety regulations.

Bianucci Law Firm
Judgment No. 47333 of 2024: Substitute Penalties and Burden of Proof

The recent ruling of the Court of Appeal of Milan clarifies the inadmissibility of requests for alternative sentences to short prison sentences without the necessary documentation, highlighting the absence of a burden on the defendant and the limitations of local agreements.

Bianucci Law Firm
The Use of Facebook Messages as Evidence: Commentary on Judgment No. 46715 of 2024

The recent ruling of the Court of Cassation clarifies the methods of acquisition and evidential use of messages exchanged on Facebook, highlighting the distinction between traffic data and intercepted communications.

Bianucci Law Firm
Analysis of Judgment No. 45413 of 2024: the Preclusive Effect of the Measures of the Enforcement Judge.

Judgment no. 45413 of 2024 provides important insights regarding the preclusive effect of the measures taken by the enforcement judge, clarifying the limits and conditions for a new decision on the same subject.

Bianucci Law Firm
Commentary on ruling no. 45829 of 2024: substitute penalties and the competence of the judge of referral.

Analysis of ruling no. 45829 of 2024 regarding the application of substitute penalties in the event of annulment with referral. An in-depth look at the transitional provisions introduced by the Cartabia Reform.

Bianucci Law Firm
Commentary on Judgment No. 44311 of 2024: Tax Crimes and Declaration Obligation

Analysis of the recent ruling on the configurability of the crime of false declaration in relation to the proceeds from illegal activities and tax reporting obligations.

Bianucci Law Firm
Judgment No. 46236 of 2024 and the Aggravating Factor of the Presence of a Minor in Criminal Law

An analysis of ruling no. 46236 of 2024, which clarifies the legal implications of the presence of a minor during the commission of crimes, particularly in the context of sexual violence.