Bianucci Law Firm
Electricity Theft: Commentary on Judgment No. 13776 of 2024

Analysis of ruling no. 13776 of 2024 concerning electricity theft and the requirement of a complaint, focusing on the relevance of the aggravating circumstance of being intended for public service.

Bianucci Law Firm
Analysis of Judgment No. 14403 of 2024: Mafia-Type Association and the Concept of Intimidating Force.

Judgment No. 14403 of 2024 provides important clarifications on the configurability of the crime of mafia-type association in territories different from those of origin, excluding the need for the externalization of intimidating force.

Bianucci Law Firm
Analysis of Judgment No. 13201 of 2024: Liability in the Cooperation of Persons in the Crime.

Judgment No. 13201 of 2024 raises important reflections on the criminal liability of co-offenders, clarifying the meaning of presence and participation in the criminal act.

Bianucci Law Firm
Judgment No. 13203 of 2024: Relevance of the Special Effect Aggravating Circumstance in the Statute of Limitations.

Let's analyze ruling no. 13203 of 2024, which clarifies the relevance of the aggravating circumstance with special effect in the calculation of the statute of limitations, even in the absence of an indication of the measure of increase in the penalty.

Bianucci Law Firm
Analysis of Judgment No. 16138 of 2024: Dismissal and Insignificance of the Fact.

The recent ruling of the Court of Cassation provides significant insights into the validity of dismissal for criminal irrelevance and the assessment of the insignificance of the act. Let’s explore what this means for the parties involved and which regulations govern it.

Bianucci Law Firm
Judgment No. 14417 of 2024: Provocation and Stalking, a Delicate Boundary.

The recent ruling of the Court of Appeal of Turin clarifies the incompatibility between the mitigating circumstance of provocation and the crime of stalking, highlighting the complexity of habitual offenses and their legal peculiarities.

Bianucci Law Firm
Ruling No. 17047 of 2024: Precautionary Measures and the Need for Clinical Checks

The recent ruling of the Court of Liberties of Reggio Calabria clarifies the conditions for the applicability of precautionary measures concerning the health of the detainee, highlighting the need for periodic clinical checks and the methods for safeguarding health within the prison system.

Bianucci Law Firm
Judgment No. 16141 of 2024: Inadmissibility of the Request for Suspension of Company Seizure.

Let's analyze ruling no. 16141 of 2024, which clarifies the position of the Court of Appeal of Catanzaro regarding the inadmissibility of the request for suspension of the execution of the liquidation of a company subject to confiscation.

Bianucci Law Firm
Analysis of Judgment No. 16434 of 21/02/2024: Pre-Trial Detention for Offenses of Participation in Historical Mafias.

The ruling no. 16434 of 21/02/2024 addresses the issues related to pre-trial detention in cases of participation in historical mafia associations. It examines the presumptions of the necessity of precautionary measures and the meaning of the so-called 'silent time'.

Bianucci Law Firm
Analysis of Judgment No. 16412 of 2024: The Relevance of the Declaration of Non-Joining as a Civil Party.

The ruling no. 16412 of 2024 of the Court of Cassation clarifies the meaning of the complainant's declaration of not constituting themselves as a civil party, highlighting the distinction between the will to lodge a complaint and the civil action for damages.