Bianucci Law Firm
Seizure of digital data for evidence: commentary on Judgment No. 17312 of 2024

Analysis of the recent ruling concerning the evidential seizure of data contained in electronic devices. We explore the legal implications and the requirements of proportionality and justification.

Bianucci Law Firm
Analysis of Judgment No. 14882 of 2024: The Digital Signature of the Defender and Its Legal Value.

The recent ruling no. 14882 of 2024 clarifies the importance of the digital signature of the defense lawyer in relation to electronically filed motions, highlighting its authentication value and the practical consequences of this provision in criminal proceedings.

Bianucci Law Firm
Commentary on Judgment No. 15673 of 2024: The Role of the Third Party in Preventive Seizure.

Judgment No. 15673 of 2024 provides important insights on the right of a third-party titleholder to contest a preventive seizure, clarifying the necessary conditions for the validity of confiscation and the role of the fictitious nature of the title.

Bianucci Law Firm
Commentary on Judgment No. 17445 of 2024: Ineffectiveness of Seizure and Obligation of Return.

Judgment No. 17445 of 2024 of the Court of Cassation clarifies the consequences of the expiration of the term in the appeal against confiscation, establishing the ineffectiveness of the measure and the obligation to return the assets in case of exceeding the deadlines set by law.

Bianucci Law Firm
Commentary on Judgment No. 16979 of 2024: Covid-19 Contributions and Undue Perception.

The ruling no. 16979 of 2024 by the Court of Cassation provides important clarifications on the configuration of the crime of fraudulent receipt of public funds in relation to the economic contributions provided by the Italian State during the Covid-19 pandemic.

Bianucci Law Firm
Analysis of Judgment No. 15389 of 2024: Conditional Suspension of the Sentence and Correction of Errors

Judgment No. 15389 of 2024 clarifies the limits of the correction of material errors regarding conditional suspension of the sentence and provides useful insights for a proper interpretation of the regulations in criminal matters.

Bianucci Law Firm
Analysis of Judgment No. 17316 of 2024: Extradition and Death Penalty

An in-depth analysis of the Supreme Court ruling regarding extradition in cases of death penalty, focusing on Italian legislation and the implications for human rights.

Bianucci Law Firm
Ruling No. 13628 of 2023: Appeal and Aggravating Circumstances in Criminal Law.

The recent ruling of the Court of Appeal of Trieste clarifies the lack of interest in appealing aggravating circumstances already deemed substandard. An analysis of the case law and applicable regulations.

Bianucci Law Firm
Analysis of Judgment No. 17171 of 2024: Rescission of the Res Judicata and Burden of Allegation.

The ruling no. 17171 of 2024 by the Court of Cassation clarifies the importance of timeliness in the request for the annulment of the judgment and the strict burden of allegation on the applicant.

Bianucci Law Firm
Judgment No. 13775 of 2024: Proceedability by Complaint and Cartabia Reform

Let's analyze the ruling no. 13775 of 2024, which clarifies the limits of the prosecution by complaint following the Cartabia Reform. Let's discover how the deadline for filing the complaint affects the judge's decision.