Analysis of Judgment No. 16412 of 2024: The Relevance of the Declaration of Not Constituting a Civil Party

The recent judgment No. 16412 of February 21, 2024, by the Court of Cassation, filed on April 19, 2024, provides an important reflection on the topic of complaint and the constitution of a civil party, clarifying some fundamental aspects of the willingness to pursue a subject criminally. The ruling fits into a complex legal context, where the dynamics between criminal action and civil action frequently intersect, creating possible ambiguities for complainants and lawyers.

The Heart of the Ruling: Relevance of the Declaration of Not Constituting a Civil Party

The Court of Cassation established that "the declaration of the complainant not to constitute themselves as a civil party does not in itself indicate a lack of willingness to file a complaint, as the complaint concerns the willingness to pursue a subject criminally, while the constitution of a civil party pertains to the exercise of civil action concerning the claim for damages." This passage is crucial because it clarifies that the willingness to pursue a crime is not necessarily linked to the willingness to request compensation for the damage suffered.

Declaration of the complainant not wanting to constitute themselves as a civil party - Relevance regarding the persistence of punitive intent - Exclusion - Reasons. In the matter of complaint, the declaration of the complainant not to constitute themselves as a civil party does not in itself indicate a lack of willingness to file a complaint, as the complaint concerns the willingness to pursue a subject criminally, while the constitution of a civil party pertains to the exercise of civil action concerning the claim for damages.

Practical Implications of the Ruling

This ruling has several practical implications that deserve attention. First of all, it is essential that complainants understand the distinction between the two actions:

  • Complaint: expresses the willingness to pursue a subject criminally.
  • Constitution of a Civil Party: concerns the exercise of civil action to request compensation.

The ruling emphasizes that even if a complainant decides not to constitute themselves as a civil party, this does not imply that their willingness to file a complaint diminishes. This is particularly relevant in contexts where the decision to request compensation is postponed or deemed unnecessary for personal or strategic reasons.

Conclusions

In conclusion, judgment No. 16412 of 2024 represents an important clarification in the field of criminal law, highlighting the distinction between the willingness to complain and that of constituting a civil party. Lawyers and their clients must pay particular attention to this aspect, as it can significantly influence the legal strategy to be adopted. Awareness of this distinction helps protect the rights of the complainant, ensuring that their willingness to pursue a crime is not mistakenly interpreted based on their decision not to request immediate compensation.

Bianucci Law Firm