Analysis of Judgment No. 16138 of 2024: Archiving and Triviality of the Fact

The judgment No. 16138 of February 8, 2024, of the Court of Cassation is situated within a legal context of significant importance, addressing the issue of the archiving of criminal proceedings due to the irrelevance of the fact. In particular, the Court has established that the order of the investigating judge is not flawed by nullity, provided that the parties have been informed of the possibility of archiving due to the triviality of the fact.

The Case and the Court's Decision

In the specific case, the GIP of the Court of Florence accepted the request for archiving made by the public prosecutor, despite the opposition from the injured party. The Court of Cassation confirmed the legitimacy of this archiving, emphasizing that the information regarding the triviality of the fact must be expressly mentioned in the decree setting the hearing.

  • Request for archiving due to criminal irrelevance of the fact.
  • Opposition from the injured party.
  • Identification of the triviality of the fact in the decree setting the hearing.

The Maximum of the Judgment

Request for archiving due to criminal irrelevance of the fact - Opposition from the injured party - Decree setting the hearing - Indication of the possibility of archiving due to particular triviality of the fact - Nullity of the consequent archiving provision - Nullity - Exclusion. Regarding archiving, the order of the investigating judge that, following the public prosecutor's request for archiving due to criminal irrelevance of the fact, orders the archiving pursuant to Article 131-bis of the Penal Code is not flawed by nullity provided that in the decree setting the hearing it has expressly informed the parties of the necessity to evaluate the possibility of archiving due to the particular triviality of the fact.

This maxim highlights the importance of a correct informative procedure towards the parties involved. In fact, without such information, the parties could find themselves at a disadvantage, unable to exercise their rights knowingly.

Regulatory and Jurisprudential References

The regulatory core of this judgment lies in Article 131-bis of the Penal Code, which governs archiving due to the triviality of the fact. Additionally, the decision refers to various norms of the New Code of Criminal Procedure, highlighting a consolidated interpretation of jurisprudence regarding the management of archivings. The Court cited several previous judgments, demonstrating a consistent orientation in supporting the importance of correct information for the parties.

Conclusions

In conclusion, judgment No. 16138 of 2024 represents an important confirmation of the necessity for clear and exhaustive procedures in the criminal field. The Court of Cassation reiterated that, to avoid nullities, it is essential to inform the parties about the possibility of archiving due to the triviality of the fact. This not only protects the rights of the individuals involved but also contributes to ensuring the efficiency of the judicial system as a whole.

Bianucci Law Firm