Bianucci Law Firm
Ruling No. 16822 of 2022: House Arrest and Late Request in Hearing

Analysis of judgment no. 16822 of 2022, which clarifies the possibility of requesting home detention as an alternative to probation and the necessary legal conditions.

Bianucci Law Firm
Commentary on Judgment No. 15636 of 2023: The Importance of Contradictory in the Confiscation Revocation Procedure.

Judgment No. 15636 of 2023 clarifies that the opposition to the order rejecting the request for revocation in matters of confiscation must respect the adversarial principle, under penalty of nullity of the provision. An analysis of the legal and practical implications of this ruling.

Bianucci Law Firm
Commentary on Judgment No. 15635 of 2023: European Arrest Warrant and the Principle of Specialty

The recent ruling of the Court of Cassation clarifies the application of the principle of specialty in the context of the European Arrest Warrant, excluding its applicability in cases of confiscation. Let’s explore the details and legal implications of this ruling.

Bianucci Law Firm
Judgment No. 16054 of 2023: Jealousy and Murder, when the aggravating factor applies.

The recent ruling no. 16054 of 2023 by the Court of Cassation clarifies the applicability of the aggravating circumstance for murder motivated by jealousy, highlighting the necessary conditions for its configuration. Let's explore together the details and legal implications of this important ruling.

Bianucci Law Firm
Analysis of Judgment No. 16063 of 2023: Competencies in the Revocation of Substitute Sanctions.

The recent ruling of the Court of Cassation provides important clarifications on the jurisdiction to decide regarding the revocation of substitute sanctions, particularly concerning community service and requests for restitution within the term.

Bianucci Law Firm
Commentary on Judgment No. 36573 of 2024: Preventive Seizure and Start Date.

Analysis of ruling no. 36573 of 2024 regarding the start date of the asset prevention proceedings, with particular reference to the death of the interested party.

Bianucci Law Firm
Commentary on Judgment No. 38605 of 2024: Extradition and Precautionary Measures

Analysis of judgment no. 38605 of 2024 regarding extradition, highlighting the importance of assessing the grounds for refusal under Article 714, paragraph 3, of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

Bianucci Law Firm
Analysis of Judgment No. 40174 of 2024: The Role of the Bankruptcy Trustee and the Refusal of Official Acts.

The ruling of the Court of Cassation No. 40174 of 2024 clarifies the limits of the bankruptcy trustee's liability, distinguishing between delay and refusal of official acts. Let us explore the necessary conditions to configure the offense.

Bianucci Law Firm
Commentary on Judgment No. 40177 of 2024: Inadmissibility of the Public Prosecutor's Appeal to the Supreme Court.

Judgment no. 40177 of 2024 examines the issue of the inadmissibility of the appeal to the Court of Cassation filed by the public prosecutor in the case of abnormal acts, delving into the concept of interest in appealing.

Bianucci Law Firm
Commentary on Judgment No. 39560 of 2024 Regarding Extradition in the Context of Armed Conflict.

The recent ruling of the Court of Cassation provides important clarifications on the issue of extradition to countries involved in armed conflicts, highlighting the necessary guarantees to avoid inhuman and degrading treatment.