Bianucci Law Firm
Analysis of Judgment No. 38772 of 2024: Offense Against a Public Official and Virtual Presence.

The recent ruling no. 38772 of 2024 emphasizes the equivalence between physical and virtual presence in cases of contempt of public officials, with significant implications for Italian jurisprudence.

Bianucci Law Firm
Judgment No. 37438 of 2024: Reflections on the European Arrest Warrant

Analyzing the recent ruling no. 37438 of 2024 provides an important opportunity to understand the mechanisms of the European arrest warrant and the implications of the finality of the conviction in the Italian and European legal context.

Bianucci Law Firm
Judgment No. 37150 of 2024: Alternative Measures to Detention and Stability of the Measure.

The recent ruling of the Court of Cassation clarifies the legal nature of alternative measures to detention, distinguishing between granting provisions and their stability over time, providing food for thought for jurists and legal professionals.

Bianucci Law Firm
Judgment No. 37142/2024: The Cartabia Reform and the Officio Proceedability in Energy Theft.

Analyzing ruling no. 37142 of 2024, the innovations introduced by the Cartabia Reform regarding the ex officio prosecution in cases of offenses that have become prosecutable by complaint are highlighted. A crucial in-depth analysis to understand the legal implications and the procedures to be adopted.

Bianucci Law Firm
Commentary on Judgment No. 39722 of 2024: Competition between Abuse and Torture.

Let’s analyze ruling no. 39722 of 2024, which clarifies the overlap between domestic violence and torture. An important decision for the protection of human dignity and psycho-physical integrity.

Bianucci Law Firm
Analysis of Judgment No. 37160 of 2024: Conditional Suspension of Sentence and Provisional Measures.

Let's explore together the recent ruling of the Court of Cassation that clarifies the requirements for conditional suspension of the sentence subject to the payment of a provisional amount, highlighting the judge's burden of motivation.

Bianucci Law Firm
Judgment No. 37154 of 2024 on the Rescission of Res Judicata: Analysis and Implications

An analysis of ruling no. 37154 of 2024, which modifies the prerequisites for the rescission of the judgment according to the Cartabia reform, clarifying the need to demonstrate the condemned person's knowledge of the proceedings.

Bianucci Law Firm
Judgment No. 40301 of 2024: Stalking and the Aggravating Circumstance for Minors

Let’s analyze ruling no. 40301 of 2024, which clarifies the applicability of the aggravating factor for minors in the crime of stalking, highlighting the fundamental regulatory distinction.

Bianucci Law Firm
Commentary on Judgment No. 39162 of 2024: Substitute Penalties and Reeducational Purpose.

Let's analyze ruling no. 39162 of 2024, which clarifies the criteria for the application of substitute sentences, highlighting the importance of the judge's prognostic reasoning.

Bianucci Law Firm
Commentary on Judgment No. 36467 of 2024: Suspension of Proceedings and Probation.

The recent ruling of the Court of Cassation clarifies important aspects regarding the suspension of proceedings with probation, highlighting the evidential burden of the defendant in the event of requalification of the fact.