Bianucci Law Firm
Judgment No. 36906 of 2024: Relevance of Recidivism and Mitigating Circumstances.

Analysis of judgment no. 36906 of 2024 of the Court of Cassation regarding recidivism and its subordinate consideration in relation to mitigating circumstances, with a focus on legal and jurisprudential implications.

Bianucci Law Firm
Commentary on Sentence No. 37887 of 2024: Extension of the Detention Regime pursuant to Article 41-bis.

The ruling no. 37887 of 2024 offers important insights into the extension of the differentiated detention regime and the need for careful assessment of the danger related to the operation of criminal associations.

Bianucci Law Firm
Judgment No. 37886 of 2024: Daytime Isolation and Concurrent Sentences in Italian Jurisprudence.

Let's analyze the recent ruling of the Court of Cassation regarding daytime isolation as a penal sanction and its application in cases of concurrent sentences, focusing on the criteria for determining the duration.

Bianucci Law Firm
Extended confiscation and mortgage: commentary on ruling no. 37108 of 2024.

The ruling no. 37108 of 2024 provides important clarifications on the non-opposability of the mortgage in the case of extended confiscation, highlighting the relevance of any fraudulent agreements and the good faith of the transferors.

Bianucci Law Firm
Apologia of Fascism: Analysis of Judgment No. 37859 of 2024

The recent ruling of the Court of Cassation on the apology of fascism provides crucial insights for understanding the limits of freedom of expression and the necessity of protecting democracy. Let’s analyze the legal and social implications of this important case.

Bianucci Law Firm
Commentary on ruling no. 37860 of 2024: Crime of unauthorized re-entry into the territory of the State.

Let's analyze ruling no. 37860 of 2024, which clarifies the requirements for the crime of unauthorized re-entry, highlighting the importance of the 'status' of foreign citizen at the time of expulsion.

Bianucci Law Firm
Commentary on Judgment No. 38452 of 2024: Prison Benefits and Unification of Concurrent Sentences

Let's analyze the recent ruling no. 38452 of 2024 concerning the unification of concurrent sentences for offenses obstructing the granting of prison benefits, in order to understand the legal and practical implications of this decision.

Bianucci Law Firm
Conditional Suspension of Sentence: Commentary on Judgment No. 37899 of 2024

The recent ruling no. 37899 of 2024 clarifies the limitations on granting conditional suspension of the sentence for defendants who do not appeal the abbreviated judgment. An analysis of the legal and practical implications.

Bianucci Law Firm
Judgment No. 37924 of 2024: Right to Participate in the Review Hearing in Precautionary Measures.

Judgment No. 37924 of 2024 clarifies the defendant's right to personally participate in the review hearing, even with a supplementary request. An important safeguard for the defense in criminal proceedings.

Bianucci Law Firm
Commentary on Judgment No. 37918 of 2024: Jurisdiction and Remand Judgment.

The recent ruling of the Court of Cassation clarifies the issue of the competence of the remanding judge, highlighting the conditions for review in the case of new facts. Let’s explore the meaning of these legal provisions together.