Bianucci Law Firm
Judgment No. 18681/2024: The Need for Identification in the Preliminary Real Estate Sale Agreement.

The ruling no. 18681 of 2024 clarifies the importance of identifying the property in preliminary contracts, establishing that the subject must clearly emerge from the preliminary agreement itself, in accordance with the provisions of the Civil Code.

Bianucci Law Firm
Analysis of Order No. 18545 of 2024: Specific Performance of the Preliminary Contract.

Order No. 18545 of 2024 clarifies the prerequisites for the specific performance of the obligation to conclude a preliminary contract, highlighting the importance of the substantial identity of the asset subject to the transfer.

Bianucci Law Firm
The importance of the principle of the appearance of law: commentary on Ordinance No. 18345 of 2024.

The order of the Court of Cassation reiterates the importance of accuracy in verifying the legal situation, highlighting the limits of the principle of the appearance of law in the case of excusable error. Let us explore the meaning of this ruling together.

Bianucci Law Firm
Commentary on Judgment No. 18238 of 03/07/2024: The Super Condominium and Its Constitution.

Let's analyze the recent ruling no. 18238 of 2024 regarding the configuration of the super condominium, clarifying the legal principles and the importance of the regulations concerning the co-ownership of real rights in the condominium context.

Bianucci Law Firm
The importance of the distinction between dolus causam dans and dolus incidens: analysis of Ordinance no. 17988 of 2024.

Discover how the recent Order No. 17988 of 2024 clarifies the distinction between dolus causam dans and dolus incidens, influencing the annulment of contracts and the compensation for damages.

Bianucci Law Firm
The right to defense in seizure and confiscation: commentary on Ordinance no. 17813 of 27/06/2024

Order No. 17813 of 2024 clarifies the rights of third-party owners in the event of seizure and confiscation, highlighting the need for a preliminary step before the criminal judge to demonstrate good faith.

Bianucci Law Firm
Ruling No. 17746/2024: The Prevalence of the Tenant's Right in the Matter of Redemption.

Let’s analyze ruling no. 17746 of 2024, which clarifies the precedence of the tenant's rights over those of the grantor in the case of redemption and termination for non-performance.

Bianucci Law Firm
Order No. 17178 of 2024: The Exception of Ultrapetition and the Role of the Judge

Let’s analyze order no. 17178 of 2024, highlighting the importance of the exception of ultrapetition and how the judge must evaluate the elements of the case without considering unavailable documentary evidence.

Bianucci Law Firm
Preventive Agreement and Disputed Credits: Judgment No. 21431 of 2024

The recent ruling of the Court of Appeal of Bari clarifies the importance of including disputed claims in the classes of the preventive agreement, ensuring transparency and fairness in the procedure.

Bianucci Law Firm
Commentary on Judgment No. 17005 of 2024: Omission of Examination and Relevance of Decisive Facts

Let's analyze the recent ruling of the Court of Cassation that clarifies the boundaries of the error of omitted examination of a historical fact and its relevance for the decision. A crucial issue for Italian jurisprudence.