Bianucci Law Firm
Unbearable noise emissions: commentary on ruling no. 21479 of 2024.

Order no. 21479 of 2024 analyzes the parameters for assessing noise emissions between private parties, highlighting the importance of the judgment of the trial judge and the regulations provided by the civil code.

Bianucci Law Firm
Contract Resolution and Deposit: Commentary on Ordinance No. 21317 of 2024

Let’s analyze Ordinance No. 21317 of July 30, 2024, which clarifies the relationship between withdrawal and termination of the contract, highlighting the non-novelty of the termination request compared to legitimate withdrawal.

Bianucci Law Firm
Commentary on Judgment No. 21138 of 2024: Compensation for Unjust Enrichment and Recovery Function.

Let’s analyze the recent ruling of the Court of Cassation that clarifies the limits of compensation for unjust enrichment, highlighting the differences between recovery function and corresponding function.

Bianucci Law Firm
The tacit revocation of the form agreement in ruling no. 20052 of 2024: clarifications and legal implications.

Let's analyze the recent ruling no. 20052 of 2024 from the Court of Cassation regarding the possibility of tacit revocation of the written form in contracts. Let's discover what it means for the parties involved and what the legal implications are.

Bianucci Law Firm
Commentary on Judgment No. 19979 of 2024: Contractor Liability and Defects in the Work.

Let's analyze ruling no. 19979 of 2024, which clarifies the rights of the client in the event of the contractor's default, highlighting the principles of liability and the conditions for opposing defects and non-conformities of the work.

Bianucci Law Firm
Commentary on Judgment No. 19921 of 2024: Disciplinary Sanctions in the Healthcare Sector

The recent ruling no. 19921 of 2024 clarifies that the failure to indicate the date of deliberation in a sanctioning measure does not result in the nullity of the measure itself, providing insights on the disciplinary procedure in healthcare professions.

Bianucci Law Firm
Analysis of Judgment No. 19957/2024: Immediate Contestation and Administrative Sanctions

The recent ruling of the Court of Cassation clarifies the limits of immediate contestation in administrative sanctions not related to road traffic, highlighting the evidentiary consequences for the violation report.

Bianucci Law Firm
Judgment No. 19746 of 2024: Creation of Agricultural Local Roads and Incidental Community.

The recent ruling of the Court of Appeal of Potenza clarifies the methods for creating agricultural local roads and the legal implications related to incidental ownership, particularly examining the respect for social function and the conflict with Article 42 of the Constitution.

Bianucci Law Firm
Commentary on Judgment No. 19716 of 2024: Administrative Sanctions and the Powers of the Judge

Analysis of ruling no. 19716 of 2024 regarding the opposition to the extent of administrative sanctions in the context of the TUB and TUF, highlighting the discretionary powers of the judge and the conditions for review.

Bianucci Law Firm
Order No. 19711 of 2024: The Validity of Urban Planning Certification in Land Sales.

The ruling of the Court of Cassation clarifies the conditions for the integration of urban planning certification in the case of the sale of land that has become non-buildable. Discover how this ruling affects real estate transactions.