• via Alberto da Giussano, 26, 20145 Milano
  • +39 02 4003 1253
  • info@studiolegalebianucci.it
  • Criminal Lawyer, Family Lawyer, Divorce Lawyer

Analysis of the ruling Cass. pen., Sez. VI, n. 21986 of 2023: Embezzlement and Criminal Responsibility

The ruling n. 21986 of 2023 issued by the Court of Cassation offers an important reflection on the crimes of embezzlement, particularly concerning the figure of the defendant, A.A., who, as the Director of general and administrative services in several schools, was convicted of the misappropriation of public funds. The Court's decision, which upheld the conviction on appeal, raises various legal questions, including the definition of the availability of sums of money and the impact of mental illness on criminal responsibility.

The context of the conviction for embezzlement

In the case at hand, the defendant is accused of altering the accounting of the educational institutions by issuing false payment orders and misappropriating sums paid by parents for educational trips. The Court of Cassation clarified that, although the defendant claims not to have the availability of the funds, Italian law (art. 314 c.p.) defines embezzlement as the appropriation of money that one has availability of due to their office.

  • The conduct of the defendant was qualified as embezzlement since her role conferred upon her the ability to manage the sums, even in conjunction with the school principal.
  • The attempt to reclassify the crimes as aggravated fraud was rejected by the Court, which emphasized the trust relationship inherent in the management of public funds.
Criminal responsibility for embezzlement is also configured in the presence of joint availability of money by multiple public officials.

The question of the capacity to understand and will

A central aspect of the appeal concerns the alleged inability of the defendant to understand and will, affected by gambling addiction. The defense argued that this mental disorder would have affected her ability to interact with money appropriately. However, the Court reiterated that to recognize a total or partial mental defect, it is necessary to demonstrate a direct causal link between the disorder and the criminal conduct.

In this case, the Court noted that:

  • There was insufficient evidence that the sums misappropriated had been used to fuel the gambling addiction.
  • The disorder was diagnosed only after most of the crimes had been committed.

Conclusions

The ruling of the Court of Cassation n. 21986 of 2023 represents an important reference point for jurisprudence regarding embezzlement. It highlights not only the seriousness of illegal conduct by public officials but also the need for an accurate assessment of criminal responsibility in relation to mental health. The decision underscores how the dynamics of power and control within public administrations are fundamental to ensuring the proper management of public funds and the trust of the community.