Commentary on Judgment No. 24225 of 2023: Reflections on Tax Crimes

The judgment no. 24225 of March 14, 2023, by the Court of Cassation offers important insights into the management of tax crimes and the methods of evaluating evidence in criminal proceedings. In particular, the Court addressed the issue of the possibility of drawing evidentiary elements from evaluations made in tax assessments, highlighting how the criminal judge is not bound by such evaluations but must arrive at a motivated conclusion of their own.

The Role of the Criminal Judge

A central aspect of the judgment concerns the freedom of evaluation of the criminal judge. According to what has been established, the judge is not obliged to strictly follow the conclusions reached by the Revenue Agency, but has the authority to use these evaluations as inductive elements in their process of forming a conviction. This represents an important distinction, as it emphasizes the need for adequate motivation to justify any divergences from what has already been established in the tax context.

The Conditions for Using Tax Assessments

The judgment also clarifies the necessary conditions for the criminal judge to make use of tax evaluations. In this regard, the maxim of the judgment states:

Crimes - Evaluations made in tax assessments - Possibility of drawing evidentiary elements in the criminal process - Existence - Conditions - Adequate motivation - Necessity - Case. In the context of tax crimes, the criminal judge is not bound by the evaluations made in the tax assessment, but may, with adequate motivation, appreciate the inductive elements valued therein, to draw evidentiary elements suitable to support their conviction. (Case concerning the crime of failure to pay VAT, in which the decision was deemed correct as it referenced the calculation made by the Revenue Agency, adopted by the territorial tax commission). (Conf.: No. 8319 of 1994, Rv. 198777-01).

This maxim underscores the importance of a robust motivation from the judge, without which any inductive evaluations could not be used as evidence. This approach ensures a greater guarantee of fairness in the criminal process, preventing hasty conclusions based solely on tax assessments.

Conclusions

In conclusion, judgment no. 24225 of 2023 represents a significant step forward in the jurisprudence regarding tax crimes, clarifying the role of the criminal judge and the necessity of adequate motivation for the use of tax evaluations. This approach not only protects the rights of the defendants but also contributes to ensuring a fair and just process, essential for the proper functioning of the legal system.

Bianucci Law Firm