• via Alberto da Giussano, 26, 20145 Milano
  • +39 02 4003 1253
  • info@studiolegalebianucci.it
  • Criminal Lawyer, Family Lawyer, Divorce Lawyer

Commentary on Judgment No. 34630 of 2023: Extended Confiscation and Source of Assets

The judgment no. 34630 of May 12, 2023, by the Court of Cassation is situated within a complex legal context regarding the extended confiscation provided for by Article 240-bis of the Penal Code. This measure has sparked extensive debates, particularly concerning the source of the confiscated assets and the effectiveness of the justifications presented by the defendants.

What the Judgment Establishes

The case in question featured G. V., who had to justify the source of an asset subject to seizure. The Court clarified that, in the case of extended confiscation, it is not sufficient to demonstrate that the funds used to purchase the asset were obtained through a loan if such funds originate from criminal activity. The importance of this judgment lies in the principle that a loan contract cannot serve as a shield to justify illicit wealth accumulation.

Extended confiscation - Relevance, for the purpose of justifying the source of the asset, that the sums for its purchase were lawfully obtained by way of loan - In the case of fulfillment of the obligation arising from the loan with illicit funds - Exclusion - Reasons. In terms of so-called extended confiscation under Article 240-bis of the Penal Code, it does not matter, for the purpose of justifying the source of the asset, that the funds used for the purchase of the seized asset were provided as a loan, if the money intended for fulfilling the obligation arising from such a contract comes from the carrying out of criminal activity. (In the reasoning, the Court stated that, in such a case, the loan contract constitutes a segment of a broader illicit operation aimed at evading the prohibition established by the legal system, namely allowing the offender to retain assets linked to illicit wealth accumulation).

Legal and Practical Implications

This judgment represents an important step forward in the fight against economic crime and money laundering. In fact, it clarifies that the use of legal instruments, such as loans, cannot be used to conceal the illicit origin of funds. The implications are significant for legal professionals and institutions, as they emphasize the need for constant vigilance over financial flows and asset transactions.

  • Importance of transparency in asset transactions.
  • Need to identify the lawful origin of funds.
  • Active role of institutions in preventing money laundering.

Conclusions

In conclusion, judgment no. 34630 of 2023 offers a clear interpretation of extended confiscation and the source of assets, reiterating that the mere existence of a loan contract, if accompanied by illicit funds, cannot justify the acquisition of assets. This judicial orientation represents an effective deterrent for those who intend to use legal systems to mask illicit activities, and reinforces the principle that legality must prevail in every economic transaction.