• via Alberto da Giussano, 26, 20145 Milano
  • +39 02 4003 1253
  • info@studiolegalebianucci.it
  • Criminal Lawyer, Family Lawyer, Divorce Lawyer

Commentary on Judgment No. 16022 of 2023: Implications of the Appeal to the Supreme Court in Matters of Unified Crimes

Judgment No. 16022 of March 22, 2023 offers interesting points for reflection regarding the appeal to the Supreme Court and the management of crimes unified by continuity. In particular, the Supreme Court clarified that the admissibility of the appeal is limited to the most serious crime, which, in the specific case, was already time-barred before the appeal ruling. This aspect has significant repercussions on the sentencing of satellite crimes, raising a series of questions about their punishability in the context of legitimacy.

The Context of the Judgment

The case concerns an appeal filed by G. S. against a ruling of the Court of Appeal of Milan, in which the conviction for crimes unified by continuity was discussed. The Court established that, in cases where the admissibility of the appeal is limited to the most serious crime, the annulment of the judgment for that crime also affects the convictions for satellite crimes. This means that even if the grounds for appeal related to the latter are found to be inadmissible, the opening of the procedural relationship remains valid regarding the penalty.

  • Time-bar of the most serious crime before the appeal ruling.
  • Effects of annulment on the conviction for satellite crimes.
  • Possibility of declaring the extinction of the satellite crime if the time-bar matures during the appeal.

Summary of the Judgment

Appeal to the Supreme Court against a conviction ruling concerning crimes unified by continuity - Admissibility of the appeal concerning only the most serious crime, as it was time-barred before the appeal ruling - Reflections on the conviction related to satellite crimes even in the case of inadmissibility of the grounds for appeal related to them - Existence - Reasons - Case. In the case of an appeal to the Supreme Court against a conviction for crimes united by the bond of continuity, where the admissibility of the appeal is limited to the section related to the crime considered most serious, the annulment of the judgment regarding that section and the penalty determined for it also affects the increased sanctions imposed for satellite crimes, so that the procedural relationship remains "open" regarding the penalty even in relation to the appeal of the conviction for such crimes, despite the grounds for appeal related to them being inadmissible, so that if the time-bar matures for one of them during the definition of the appeal, its extinction must be declared. (Case in which the appeal against the conviction for the most serious crime was deemed admissible as it had been time-barred before the appeal ruling, with the consequence that the time-bar of the satellite crime, which occurred after the second-degree ruling, could be raised in the context of legitimacy).

Conclusions

In summary, judgment No. 16022 of 2023 represents an important clarification regarding appeals to the Supreme Court related to crimes unified by continuity. It highlights how the admissibility of the appeal for the most serious crime can significantly influence the legal situation of satellite crimes, even in the presence of inadmissible grounds for appeal. This approach of the Supreme Court emphasizes the importance of a comprehensive view of the procedural relationship, which remains open regarding the penalty and the time-bar, thus ensuring a more balanced protection of the rights of the defendants.