• via Alberto da Giussano, 26, 20145 Milano
  • +39 02 4003 1253
  • info@studiolegalebianucci.it
  • Criminal Lawyer, Family Lawyer, Divorce Lawyer

Commentary on the Judgment of the Court of Cassation, Criminal Section VI, No. 21985 of 2023: Embezzlement and Receipt of Weapons

The recent judgment of the Court of Cassation, Criminal Section VI, No. 21985 dated May 22, 2023, addresses significant issues concerning the crimes of embezzlement and receipt, particularly regarding the conduct of a police officer who appropriated weapons intended for destruction. This case provides important insights into how Italian jurisprudence interprets and applies the rules related to the custody and possession of seized goods.

Embezzlement in the Management of Seized Weapons

The case in question involves A.A., a police officer, convicted for appropriating weapons entrusted by private individuals for destruction. The Court of Appeal of Palermo upheld the conviction, considering it a case of embezzlement based on Article 314 of the Penal Code. The Court of Cassation reaffirmed that embezzlement occurs when a public official appropriates goods that they have in custody for official reasons. This principle is well-established in jurisprudence, as highlighted by previous judgments (Section 6, No. 24373 of 05/28/2014).

  • The officer's possession of the weapons was unlawful, as it resulted from fraudulent conduct.
  • The Court excluded that the conduct could be qualified as a mere violation of public custody, emphasizing the improper appropriation.
The conduct of a public official who appropriates goods in custody constitutes the crime of embezzlement, regardless of the means of acquiring the weapons.

The Responsibility of B.B. and Receipt

The co-defendant B.B. was found guilty of receipt for acquiring weapons from A.A. under illegal circumstances. The Court emphasized that, although B.B. possessed a valid firearms permit, this did not exempt him from criminal liability. Receipt is also established in the presence of apparent good faith if the evidence demonstrates awareness of the illicit origin of the weapons. Phone taps revealed that B.B. was aware of the illegal origin of the weapons, supporting the prosecution's case.

Conclusions and Final Reflections

The judgment in question highlights the importance of proper management of seized goods by law enforcement and the criminal consequences arising from illegal behaviors. It prompts reflection on the need to ensure transparency and legality in the custody and management of weapons. It is essential that police officers strictly adhere to the regulations in this area, as violations of such obligations not only compromise their integrity but can also have serious criminal repercussions.