• via Alberto da Giussano, 26, 20145 Milano
  • +39 02 4003 1253
  • info@studiolegalebianucci.it
  • Criminal Lawyer, Family Lawyer, Divorce Lawyer

Domestic Violence: The Supreme Court Ruling and the Requirements of Cohabitation

The recent ruling by the Supreme Court of Cassation (n. 26263 of July 4, 2024) has reignited the debate on the necessary requirements for the configuration of the crime of domestic violence, particularly regarding the necessary cohabitation between the perpetrator and the victim. The decision, which annulled the ruling of the Court of Appeal of Venice, focuses on the importance of proving cohabitation for the integration of the crime under Article 572 of the Penal Code.

The Case and the Court's Decision

In the ruling in question, A.A. had been convicted of domestic violence against his partner, but the appeal questioned the actual existence of a cohabitation relationship. The Court of Appeal had deemed that shared parenthood was sufficient to configure the crime, without adequately exploring the issue of cohabitation. However, the Cassation noted that the lack of a common life project and the geographical distance between the two were relevant elements for establishing the criminal act.

The Court emphasized that the concept of "cohabitation" presupposes a stable and lasting emotional relationship, not limited to sporadic contacts.

Legal and Social Implications

This ruling has significant implications both legally and socially. In fact, the principle establishing the necessity of effective cohabitation to configure the crime of domestic violence is fundamental to preventing abuses of the criminal law. Jurisprudence, as highlighted by the Cassation, must adhere to restrictive criteria, avoiding overly broad interpretations that could lead to conflicts between the parties.

  • Cohabitation must be characterized by a stable emotional relationship.
  • Simply sharing parenthood is not sufficient to configure a familial relationship.
  • A thorough examination of the relational dynamics between the parties involved is necessary.

Conclusions

In conclusion, the ruling of the Cassation represents a significant step towards a clearer definition of the requirements necessary for the configuration of the crime of domestic violence. The need to establish effective cohabitation between the perpetrator and the victim is a crucial element that helps ensure fair and proportionate justice. Jurisprudence must continue to evolve to adequately respond to the complexities of modern family relationships, protecting both victims of violence and the rights of the accused.