Contract Fraud and the Right to File a Complaint: An Analysis of Judgment No. 25134 of 2023

The recent judgment No. 25134 of March 7, 2023, provides significant insights regarding the protection of legal entities in the context of contract fraud. In particular, the Court of Cassation emphasized the importance of recognizing the right to file a complaint not only for legal representatives but also for those who, by their role, are responsible for overseeing the financial interests of the entity. This aspect is fundamental to ensuring effective protection against fraud, in a context where scams can also occur through decentralized structures such as branches or agencies.

The Legal Context of the Judgment

The Court examined a case in which a branch deputy director of a credit institution was empowered to file a complaint for an attempted fraud involving a forged check. This highlights an important principle: the right to file a complaint must be extended to all those who, due to their position within the organization, are called upon to ensure the financial security of the entity.

Contract fraud to the detriment of a legal entity - Holder of the right to file a complaint - Identification also in those who have supervisory powers over the interests protected by the law - Existence - Case. In the context of contract fraud, where the crime is committed through actions aimed at the conclusion of contracts established through relationships not directly with the legal entity holding the attacked assets, but with its branches (such as agencies or branches of credit institutions), the ability to file a complaint must be recognized not only to the legal representatives of the company but also to individuals who in that specific structure, due to the internal organization of the entity and the roles held within it, are contractually obligated to oversee the activities carried out in contacts with the public and to ensure the protection of the company's assets. (Case in which the Court recognized the ability to file a complaint to a branch deputy director, who was responsible for operations concluded with third parties in the name of the credit institution, and who, in that capacity, had become aware of the defendant's attempt to deposit a forged check into her account).

The Implications of the Judgment

This ruling is relevant not only for the specific case but also for its broader implications. It underscores the need for adequate protection for legal entities, especially in an economic context where fraud can have devastating consequences. The Court, referring to provisions of the Penal Code, clarified that the right to file a complaint can also be exercised by those who, while not being legal representatives, hold positions of responsibility in monitoring business operations.

  • Recognition of the right to file a complaint to internal subjects of the entity
  • Protection of company assets from fraud
  • Active role of employees in safeguarding the entity

Conclusions

In conclusion, judgment No. 25134 of 2023 represents a step forward in the protection of legal entities against contract fraud. The Court of Cassation clearly stated that the right to file a complaint can be extended to internal figures who, due to their functions, are called upon to oversee the financial security of the entity. This not only strengthens the protection of company assets but also invites a reconsideration of the supervisory and control structures within organizations, making all involved parties active participants in fraud prevention.

Bianucci Law Firm