Peculation and Gambling Addiction: Reflections on the Supreme Court Ruling

The ruling of the Court of Cassation no. 21986 of May 22, 2023, has raised significant questions regarding criminal liability in cases of peculation, especially when the defendant presents a condition of gambling addiction. The defendant, A.A., was convicted for having appropriated large sums of money that she had access to as the Director of general and administrative services of educational institutions.

The Peculation and the Defendant's Conduct

The Court confirmed A.A.'s criminal liability for various episodes of money appropriation, which occurred through the falsification of documents and the omission of payments of contributions made by families for school expenses. The conduct was classified as peculation, a crime that presupposes the availability of money by a public official.

The ruling clarifies that the joint availability of public funds by multiple public officials does not exclude the configurability of peculation.

In particular, the Court emphasized that, according to current legislation, the Director of administrative services and the school principal had co-availability of funds, which justifies the application of the peculation statute rather than that of aggravated fraud. This aspect highlights the importance of the position and duties of public officials in managing public assets.

Gambling Addiction and the Capacity to Understand and Will

A crucial point of the ruling concerns the issue of the defendant's capacity to understand and will, affected by gambling addiction. A.A. argued that her mental health condition could have influenced her criminal conduct. However, the Court found that there was no causal link between the gambling disorder and the appropriation actions, emphasizing the need to demonstrate that the disorder directly led to the commission of the crimes.

The Court referred to previous jurisprudence, stating that gambling addiction can reduce the capacity to understand and will only if there is a direct correlation between the disorder and the criminal behavior. This aspect highlights the importance of an accurate assessment of the psychological conditions of the defendant in the context of a criminal trial.

Conclusions

The ruling in question provides important reflections on the delicate balance between criminal liability and the personal conditions of the defendant. The Court of Cassation reiterated that the presence of mental disorders, such as gambling addiction, does not automatically exempt from criminal liability but requires a thorough assessment of the causal link between the disorder and the unlawful conduct. The issue of the availability of public funds and the responsibility of those who manage them remains a matter of crucial relevance in the context of criminal law.

Bianucci Law Firm