• via Alberto da Giussano, 26, 20145 Milano
  • +39 02 4003 1253
  • info@studiolegalebianucci.it
  • Criminal Lawyer, Family Lawyer, Divorce Lawyer

Commentary on the ruling of the Court of Cassation, Criminal Section VI, No. 37589 of 2018: Reflections on Extortion and Undue Inducement

The ruling No. 37589 of August 2, 2018, by the Court of Cassation represents an important reference point for understanding the legal definitions of extortion and undue inducement. In this commentary, we will analyze the main legal issues addressed in the decision and their relevance in the landscape of Italian criminal law.

The Case and the Legal Context

The case concerns M. G., a public official accused of extortion for having demanded a sum of money from a public establishment owner in exchange for not issuing a penalty. The Court of Appeal of Rome initially upheld the conviction, but the Court of Cassation deemed that the act should be classified as attempted undue inducement rather than extortion.

The threat of unjust harm by the public official aimed at obtaining money or other benefits constitutes the crime of extortion only if the intimidation has an intensity that significantly impacts the freedom of self-determination.

Distinction Between Extortion and Undue Inducement

The Court clarified that extortion, as per Article 317 of the Penal Code, requires coercive pressure, while undue inducement, as provided in Article 319-quater of the Penal Code, is characterized by persuasion or deception. This distinction is fundamental for understanding the severity of the behaviors and their related legal consequences.

  • Extortion: abuse of power through threats or violence.
  • Undue inducement: less intense moral pressure, with greater freedom for the victim.
  • Recognition of the victim in the case of attempted undue inducement.

Implications of the Ruling

The decision of the Court of Cassation emphasizes the importance of legal qualification in criminal law. The requalification from extortion to attempted undue inducement has significant implications, both for the determination of the penalty and for the recognition of the rights of the injured party. The Court also clarified that the request for money cannot be considered valid if the victim acted to report the abuse.

Conclusions

The ruling No. 37589 of 2018 by the Court of Cassation offers important insights for reflections on criminal law and the protection of victims of abuses by public officials. The distinction between extortion and undue inducement is crucial to ensure a proper legal framework for unlawful conduct. The consequences of this ruling will resonate not only in the specific case but also in future judicial practices.