• via Alberto da Giussano, 26, 20145 Milano
  • +39 02 4003 1253
  • info@studiolegalebianucci.it
  • Criminal Lawyer, Family Lawyer, Divorce Lawyer

Analysis of the Judgment of the Court of Cassation, Criminal Section III, No. 33154 of 2024: Tax Violations and Security Measures

The judgment No. 33154 of August 27, 2024, from the Court of Cassation provides important insights regarding the correct application of the rules concerning tax violations and related penalties. With this decision, the Court partially annulled the ruling of the Court of Rome, highlighting significant errors in the determination of the sentence and the omission of the confiscation of illicit profits.

The A.A. Case and the Violation of Regulations

The case concerns A.A., convicted of offenses under Legislative Decree 74/2000, which governs tax violations. The Public Prosecutor appealed the ruling, pointing out the violation of the law regarding the imposed sentence and the failure to confiscate the profit from the crime. The Court accepted the appeal, emphasizing that the trial judge had set a base sentence lower than the minimum established by law.

  • The penalty for the offenses referred to in Article 2 of Legislative Decree 74/2000 ranges from a minimum of one year and six months to a maximum of six years of imprisonment.
  • The Court of Rome erroneously set the penalty at one year of imprisonment, violating the principle of legality.
  • The Court also highlighted the obligation to confiscate illicit profits, as provided by Article 12-bis of the same decree.

Legal Principles and Reflections on Confiscation

The confiscatory measure omitted by the Court is characterized by being mandatory, given the clear and unequivocal normative text.

It is crucial to understand that the confiscation of assets represents a foundational element in the fight against tax violations. The Court clarified that, in the event of a conviction, confiscation must be ordered without any discretion on the part of the judge. This means that, regardless of the presence of installment plans or partial payments, confiscation must always be applied to ensure the restoration of legality and deterrence against unlawful behavior.

Conclusions

The judgment No. 33154 of 2024 from the Court of Cassation represents an important precedent in the field of tax criminal law. It reaffirms the necessity to strictly adhere to current regulations, emphasizing the importance of confiscation as a tool for guaranteeing fiscal legality. This case invites a profound reflection on the balance between sanction and prevention, essential for the proper functioning of the legal system.