• via Alberto da Giussano, 26, 20145 Milano
  • +39 02 4003 1253
  • info@studiolegalebianucci.it
  • Criminal Lawyer, Family Lawyer, Divorce Lawyer

Domestic Abuse: The Ruling of the Court of Cassation and Its Reflections

The recent ruling of the Supreme Court of Cassation, Section VI Criminal, dated September 27, 2021 (n. 35591), has sparked a heated debate regarding the criminal liability of healthcare professionals in cases of abuse against the elderly in care facilities. This article aims to analyze the key points of the ruling, highlighting the legal implications and related responsibilities.

The Case and the Order of the Court of Catanzaro

The Court examined the appeal of the Public Prosecutor against the order of the Court of Catanzaro, which had rejected the request for the application of precautionary measures against R.E., accused of mistreatment and kidnapping of elderly patients in a nursing home. The Court had found the evidence insufficient to support the seriousness of the allegations, arguing that the behaviors attributed to R.E. did not constitute inherently abusive conduct and that her involvement was not adequately demonstrated.

Criminal liability must always be supported by concrete and specific evidence, even in the context of abuse in care facilities.

The Arguments of the Court of Cassation

The Court of Cassation upheld the decision of the Court, emphasizing that criminal liability must be personal and cannot be based on a general climate of oppression within the facility. It was highlighted that, in order to establish liability for complicity in the crime, it is necessary to demonstrate the causal contribution and the awareness of the accused regarding the unlawful conduct of others.

  • The proof of active or passive participation must be concrete and documented.
  • Mere presence in an environment where abuse occurs is not sufficient.
  • It is necessary to specifically ascertain individual responsibilities, avoiding generalizations.

Legal Implications and Professional Reflections

This ruling raises important questions about the position of healthcare professionals within care facilities. The Court clarified that, although professional figures such as nurses have specific obligations of supervision, criminal liability cannot be extended without concrete evidence of unlawful behavior. Therefore, it is essential that operators are aware of their responsibilities and act to ensure the safety and well-being of patients.

Conclusions

The ruling of the Court of Cassation represents an important step forward in defining the criminal liability of healthcare professionals in contexts of abuse. It reaffirms the necessity of concrete and specific evidence to attribute criminal liability, emphasizing the importance of active supervision and awareness on the part of operators. It is crucial that healthcare and assistance facilities promote a culture of responsibility and protection for the most vulnerable individuals.