• via Alberto da Giussano, 26, 20145 Milano
  • +39 02 4003 1253
  • info@studiolegalebianucci.it
  • Criminal Lawyer, Family Lawyer, Divorce Lawyer

Money Laundering and Seizure: Analysis of the Judgment of the Court of Cassation No. 32176 of 2024

The judgment No. 32176 issued by the Court of Cassation on August 7, 2024, provides a significant legal framework regarding money laundering and seizure, addressing fundamental issues concerning the application of penalties and the methods of confiscating assets. This article aims to analyze the key points of the decision, highlighting the importance of distinguishing between the product, profit, and price of the crime.

The Context of the Judgment

The Court examined the appeals presented by three defendants, A.A., B.B., and C.C., convicted of crimes of money laundering, fraud, and conspiracy. In particular, the Court rejected the criticisms raised by the appellants, emphasizing that the arguments put forth did not meet the parameters established by Article 448, paragraph 2-bis, of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

Seizure of Assets and the Principle of Legality

The Court's interpretation emphasizes that the legislator intends to target not only the gain of the money launderer but the entire economic benefit generated by the crime.

A crucial aspect of the judgment concerns the seizure of assets, regarded not only as a punitive tool but also as a preventive measure. The Court clarified that, in the event of a conviction for money laundering, the confiscatory measure must target the value corresponding to the sums involved in the illicit operations, regardless of their ownership by the money launderer.

  • The product of the crime: what is created or transformed through the illicit act.
  • The profit: the direct economic advantage from the crime.
  • The price: the compensation or benefit derived from committing the crime.

Legal and Regulatory Implications

The Court highlighted that the seizure should not be limited to the profit of the money launderer but should also extend to the product of the crime, as indicated by Italian laws and European directives. This principle is fundamental to ensure an effective response against money laundering, which distorts the market and promotes criminal activities.

Moreover, the judgment emphasizes the importance of aligning national legislation with European directives, highlighting how jurisprudence is increasingly aligning with international standards to combat money laundering and ensure the effectiveness of seizures.

Conclusions

In conclusion, judgment No. 32176 of 2024 underscores the importance of a broad interpretation of the laws concerning money laundering and seizure, emphasizing the need to target not only the profit but the entire system of economic benefits generated by illegal activities. This approach represents a step forward in the fight against money laundering and provides an important legal basis for future decisions in this area.