• via Alberto da Giussano, 26, 20145 Milano
  • +39 02 4003 1253
  • info@studiolegalebianucci.it
  • Criminal Lawyer, Family Lawyer, Divorce Lawyer

Commentary on the Judgment of the Supreme Court, Criminal Section III, No. 15231 of 2017: Responsibility of the Accountant and Induction into Error

The judgment of the Supreme Court No. 15231 of March 28, 2017, addressed a case of particular relevance for the profession of the accountant, examining the criminal responsibility associated with inducing a client into error. The Court upheld the conviction of R.P., an accountant for the company "Diva Center s.r.l.", for having misled his client C.B. regarding a non-existent tax credit.

Context and Facts of the Case

The case began with the conviction by the Teramo Court, which found R.P. guilty of providing misleading information to C.B., causing her to submit tax forms (F23 and F24) to offset a VAT debt that never existed. The appellant contested the decision, citing the lack of a specific mandate from C.B. and arguing that she had not derived any profit from his conduct.

The Court highlighted that the responsibility of the accountant cannot be considered solely based on the professional figure but must take into account the behavior that misled the client.

Legal Principles and Evaluation by the Supreme Court

The Supreme Court clarified that, in the legitimacy judgment, it is not permitted to review the factual elements already examined at the merit level. R.P. raised objections concerning the reasoning, but the Court found these to be manifestly unfounded. It was emphasized that the conviction was supported by a solid argumentative path based on objective evidence and not on manifest illogic.

  • The appeal was declared inadmissible.
  • The Court confirmed the penalty based on the appellant's prior criminal records.
  • The responsibility of the accountant was framed according to Article 48 of the Criminal Code, concerning error caused by another's deceit.

Implications for the Accounting Profession

This judgment has significant implications for professionals in the sector. It underscores the importance of ethical and professional behavior, highlighting that the accountant must always act with diligence and transparency toward their clients. Inducing into error not only has criminal consequences but can also irreparably damage professional reputation.

Conclusions

The judgment No. 15231 of 2017 serves as a warning for all professionals in the sector: integrity and responsibility are essential values. The Court reiterated that every professional must be aware of their actions and their consequences, not only legally but also ethically and professionally.