• via Alberto da Giussano, 26, 20145 Milano
  • +39 02 4003 1253
  • info@studiolegalebianucci.it
  • Criminal Lawyer, Family Lawyer, Divorce Lawyer

Seizure of Assets and Tax Fraud: Comments on the Judgment of the Court of Cassation No. 834/2025

The judgment No. 834 of 2025 from the Court of Cassation addresses a highly relevant issue in the Italian legal landscape: the preventive seizure of assets in cases of tax fraud. This decision provides important clarifications on the distinction between lawful business operations and fraudulent acts, revealing the complexities of Italian tax regulations.

The Case in Question

The case involves two companies, MEG Srl and LVT INDUSTRIALE Srl, both in judicial liquidation, which appealed against a preventive seizure order issued by the Court of Mantova. This seizure aimed at the direct confiscation of assets worth over 1.6 million euros, related to unpaid tax withholdings.

The crime of fraudulent evasion of tax payments is configurably when there is an operation involving the transfer of assets aimed at evading collection procedures.

The Court's Rationale

The Court upheld the seizure, emphasizing that the transfer of business branches from LVT Srl to companies controlled by it had a fraudulent character. In fact, the transfer acts were carried out in a context of tax irregularities known to the administrators, with the intent to evade the payment of I.R.P.E.F.

  • The Court highlighted elements of fraud, such as the immediate transfer of assets following the notification of irregularities.
  • The value of the crime's profit was questioned, as it cannot exceed the tax debt.
  • The principle that profit is identifiable in the value of assets suitable to serve as guarantees for the tax administration was reiterated.

Legal Implications and Conclusions

This judgment underscores the importance of carefully evaluating asset transfer operations in complex tax contexts. The Court of Cassation established a fundamental principle: any operation, even if seemingly lawful, can be considered fraudulent if carried out with the intent to evade tax obligations.

In conclusion, judgment No. 834 of 2025 represents an important reference point for legal practitioners and businesses, highlighting the need to operate transparently in commercial transactions and in compliance with existing tax regulations.