• via Alberto da Giussano, 26, 20145 Milano
  • +39 02 4003 1253
  • info@studiolegalebianucci.it
  • Criminal Lawyer, Family Lawyer, Divorce Lawyer

Fraudulent Bankruptcy: Commentary on the Taranto Court of Appeal Judgment No. 488 of 2024

The recent judgment No. 488 of 2024 by the Taranto Court of Appeal offers important insights regarding the responsibility of directors in companies in a state of insolvency. In particular, the case of V.R., accused of fraudulent documentary bankruptcy, highlights the responsibilities not only of those who physically manage the company but also of those who formally hold executive positions.

The Context of the Judgment

The case examined by the Court involves V.R., who held the position of director of R.R.M.F. s.r.l., a company that was later declared bankrupt. The first-instance judge had established his responsibility for concealing or destroying accounting records, essential for reconstructing the company's economic situation and for respecting the rights of creditors. The Court confirmed this decision, considering that the absence of accounting documentation constitutes fraudulent behavior aimed at prejudicing creditors.

The Court established that the de jure director is responsible even if they do not directly manage the company, provided they are aware of the management by others.

Responsibilities of De Jure and De Facto Directors

The judgment clarifies a fundamental principle: even a de jure director, who does not actively participate in the daily management of the company, can be deemed responsible for the crime of bankruptcy if they do not exercise adequate controls. The jurisprudence, as reported in the judgment, establishes that criminal responsibility cannot be excluded simply due to the lack of direct management.

Among the grounds of appeal presented by the defense, the asserted inactivity of the company and the predominant role of the de facto director, V.M., were highlighted. However, the Court noted that V.R. never truly distanced himself from the management, continuing to hold a formal role that carried specific responsibilities.

The Legal Implications and Consequences of the Judgment

The decision of the Taranto Court of Appeal highlights the importance of proper corporate management and the duty of oversight of directors. Criminal liability for fraudulent bankruptcy is not limited to those who operate materially but extends to all those who, by virtue of their formal position, have the obligation to ensure proper maintenance of documentation. The implications of this judgment are clear:

  • Directors must be aware of their responsibilities and duties of oversight.
  • The mere position of director does not exempt one from criminal liability.
  • Any family or trust relationships cannot justify a lack of control.

Conclusions

Judgment No. 488 of 2024 by the Taranto Court of Appeal represents an important precedent in Italian jurisprudence regarding fraudulent bankruptcy. It emphasizes how the criminal responsibility of directors extends beyond the mere formal position, requiring effective activation and oversight of corporate management. In a complex economic context, it is essential that those in responsible roles fully understand their legal duties to avoid serious financial and criminal consequences.