• via Alberto da Giussano, 26, 20145 Milano
  • +39 02 4003 1253
  • info@studiolegalebianucci.it
  • Criminal Lawyer, Family Lawyer, Divorce Lawyer

Analysis of Judgment No. 16012 of 2023: Money Laundering and Verification of Illicit Origin

The judgment no. 16012 of March 14, 2023, by the Court of Cassation represents an important reference point in the field of criminal law, particularly regarding the crime of money laundering. This ruling clarifies some fundamental aspects concerning the verification of the illicit origin of sums of money, as well as the necessary requirements to constitute the crime of money laundering.

The Context of the Judgment

The case in question involves the defendant R. S., who was found in possession of a substantial amount of cash, over one and a half million euros, hidden inside a vehicle along with narcotic substances. The Court of Appeal of Naples had previously rejected the defensive motions, stating that it was not necessary to prove the existence of the underlying crime to configure the offense of money laundering.

The Principle and Its Interpretation

Money laundering - Underlying crime - Judicial verification - Necessity - Exclusion - Case. The conduct that hinders the identification of the criminal origin of a significant sum of money constitutes the crime of money laundering, provided that, due to the place and methods of concealment, its illicit origin can be considered certain, and it is not necessary, for this purpose, to conduct a judicial verification of the commission of the underlying crime, its exact type, and its authors, as the judge can affirm its existence through logical evidence. (Case related to the discovery of a sum of over one and a half million euros in cash, hidden, along with a narcotic substance, inside a vehicle in the possession of the defendant, burdened by specific previous convictions, who was unable to indicate its origin).

This principle highlights that, to integrate the crime of money laundering, it is sufficient to demonstrate that the defendant's conduct has hindered the identification of the illicit origin of the funds. Direct judicial proof of the underlying crime is not required; rather, certainty of illicit origin based on circumstantial evidence and logical proofs is sufficient.

Practical Implications of the Judgment

The implications of this judgment are significant for judicial practice and for lawyers involved in criminal law. In fact, the decision of the Court of Cassation establishes a clear principle: in cases of money laundering, the absence of specific judicial verification regarding the underlying crime does not prevent the configuration of the offense. This approach allows investigators to rely on concrete evidence, such as the method of concealment and the presence of prior criminal records, to demonstrate the illicit origin of the sums.

  • Relevance of the context and methods of concealment.
  • Importance of logical evidence in determining illicit origin.
  • Possible developments in case law regarding money laundering.

Conclusions

In conclusion, judgment no. 16012 of 2023 provides an important clarification in the field of money laundering, establishing that the verification of illicit origin can occur even without a formal judicial verification of the underlying crime. This represents a step forward in the fight against financial crime, allowing greater flexibility in the application of the law while simultaneously ensuring the protection of the rights of the individuals involved.