The recent ruling of the Supreme Court, filed on July 30, 2024, addressed a complex case of domestic abuse and stalking, clarifying the legal boundaries between these two offenses. The decision, which annulled the custody order for A.A., offers insights into the dynamics of domestic violence and the precautionary measures applicable in such contexts.
The incident originated from an episode of violence that occurred on March 10, 2024, when A.A., after the end of cohabitation with B.B., threatened the woman while wielding a knife. This behavior led to an arrest in the act for stalking and, subsequently, to the precautionary measure of custody in prison. However, the defense contested this measure, arguing that A.A.'s behavior should be classified as a threat and not as abuse.
The Court highlighted that harassing behaviors must be assessed within the context of the existing relationship between the defendant and the victim.
The Supreme Court reiterated that, according to established case law, the crime of domestic abuse is configured in the presence of a stable and lasting bond, while stalking behaviors can be prosecuted even after the end of cohabitation. In the case of A.A. and B.B., the judge determined that A.A.'s actions could not be categorized as domestic abuse since the emotional bond had already ceased.
The ruling of the Supreme Court represents an important step forward in understanding the dynamics of domestic violence and managing precautionary measures. It underscores the importance of a correct legal qualification of the facts so that victims can receive appropriate protection and offenders face the consequences of their actions fairly. It is therefore essential that case law continues to evolve to meet the demands of justice and protection for victims of domestic violence.