• via Alberto da Giussano, 26, 20145 Milano
  • +39 02 4003 1253
  • info@studiolegalebianucci.it
  • Criminal Lawyer, Family Lawyer, Divorce Lawyer

Commentary on the Judgment of the Court of Cassation, Criminal Section No. 30143 of 2023: Self-Defamation and Favoritism in Italian Jurisprudence

The recent ruling of the Court of Cassation, No. 30143 of July 11, 2023, offers an important reflection on the crimes of self-defamation and personal favoritism, highlighting how Italian jurisprudence addresses the complexities of criminal law. In this specific case, A.A. was convicted for falsely accusing B.B. of a crime, thereby favoring the real culprit, C.C. This ruling highlights not only criminal responsibility but also the role of psychiatric conditions in accountability.

The Context of the Ruling

The Court of Appeal of Messina had upheld A.A.'s conviction for self-defamation and personal favoritism. The accused, aware of B.B.'s innocence, had agreed to a convenient version of events to evade investigations. The appeal to the Court of Cassation raised important issues, including the assessment of the defendant's capacity to understand and will, considering his diagnosis of paranoid schizophrenia.

The Court of Cassation reiterated that the unlawful conduct must present itself as the only one capable of avoiding serious harm to the agent or a relative.

The Court of Cassation's Reasoning

The Cassation Court rejected A.A.'s arguments regarding his inability to self-determine at the time of the events, emphasizing that there were no external signs that could support such a thesis. Furthermore, the Court clarified that the grounds for non-punishment, provided for by Art. 384 of the Penal Code, did not apply in the case of favoritism, as there was no evidence of coercion by C.C. against A.A. The statements made by the latter, contrary to what was claimed, did not demonstrate forced behavior.

The Role of Self-Defamation

The ruling also clarified that the crime of self-defamation prevails over that of favoritism when the individual self-accuses to protect the real perpetrator of the crime. The Court therefore annulled the conviction for favoritism, considering it absorbed in the crime of self-defamation. This aspect is crucial, as it highlights the need for a clear distinction between the two legal figures and their correct framing within the criminal system.

  • The crime of self-defamation is specific, while favoritism is generic.
  • Criminal responsibility cannot be excluded without adequate proof of incapacity.
  • Psychiatric conditions must be carefully evaluated in criminal proceedings.

Conclusions

Judgment No. 30143 of 2023 offers significant reflections for legal operators and those involved in criminal law. The Court of Cassation reiterated the importance of a rigorous analysis of accountability conditions and interpersonal dynamics in criminal situations. In an increasingly complex legal context, it is essential that the principles of responsibility and justice are applied rigorously, respecting the fundamental guarantees provided by Italian and European legislation.