• via Alberto da Giussano, 26, 20145 Milano
  • +39 02 4003 1253
  • info@studiolegalebianucci.it
  • Criminal Lawyer, Family Lawyer, Divorce Lawyer

Cass. pen. n. 20822/2024: Improper Compensation and Criminal Liability in the Tax Context

The ruling of the Court of Cassation no. 20822 of February 21, 2024, analyzes the case of an entrepreneur accused of using non-existent VAT credits to offset tax debts, raising crucial questions about criminal liability in the tax field. The Court upheld the decision of the Naples Review Court, which had found a serious evidentiary framework against the defendant A.A., considering him aware of the tax frauds in which he was involved.

The Context of the Ruling

The case involved an entrepreneur, A.A., accused of having, in collaboration with others, used fictitious VAT credits to extinguish tax debts, thereby aggravating his position. The Court examined the defendant's conduct in light of Legislative Decree no. 74 of 2000, particularly Article 10 quater, which punishes improper compensation of non-existent credits.

Criminal liability is established even in the presence of seemingly justifiable conduct, if placed in the context of systematic fraud.

The defense sought to demonstrate A.A.'s lack of involvement in the alleged crimes, arguing that he was a victim of a scam orchestrated by the co-defendants. However, the Court found that the appellant was fully aware of the illicit nature of the operation, highlighting various circumstantial evidence that demonstrated his active participation.

Circumstantial Evidence and Assessment of Responsibility

The Court emphasized several aspects that contributed to establishing the defendant's liability:

  • The negligible price of the purchased credit, which should have raised suspicions.
  • Contradictions in the explanations provided by A.A. during the interrogation.
  • The awareness of the criminal context and active participation in the illicit operations.

These elements convinced the Court of A.A.'s criminal liability, making his appeal inadmissible. The decision highlights how, even in business contexts, awareness and willingness to participate in tax fraud can lead to serious legal consequences.

Conclusions

The ruling no. 20822 of 2024 represents an important legal precedent in the field of tax and criminal law. It emphasizes the need for entrepreneurs to be vigilant and transparent in their tax operations to avoid incurring criminal liability. The Court clarified that awareness of fraud and active involvement in the illicit system are sufficient to establish criminal responsibility, even in the absence of direct evidence of intent.