Analysis of Judgment No. 30041 of 2024: Refusal of Testing for Drug Use and Criminal Relevance

Judgment No. 30041 of May 23, 2024, issued by the Court of Cassation, offers an important reflection on the offense provided for in Article 187, paragraph 8, of the Highway Code. This ruling clarifies the conditions under which the refusal to undergo testing for psychophysical impairment due to drug use may not constitute a crime, especially when the individual involved in an accident does not receive medical care in a hospital.

The Regulatory Context

The Highway Code, in Article 187, regulates the testing of psychophysical impairment due to drug use. The law imposes penalties for those who refuse to undergo such tests, but the ruling in question introduces a new element: the criminal relevance of the refusal is closely linked to the driver's health emergency situation at the time of the accident.

Offense referred to in Art. 187, paragraph 8, Highway Code - Refusal to undergo testing for psychophysical impairment due to drug use by a driver involved in an accident, but not receiving medical care at a hospital - Configurability of the crime - Exclusion - Reasons - Case. The refusal to undergo testing for the state of impairment due to drug use, by means of biological fluid sampling at a healthcare facility, by the driver of a vehicle that, although involved in a traffic accident, has not been subjected to medical care at a hospital, does not constitute the offense referred to in Art. 187, paragraph 8, Highway Code, as such conduct lacks criminal relevance due to the principles of specificity and typicity of incriminating norms. (Case concerning a driver who, immediately treated by the medical personnel of an ambulance that arrived at the accident site, subsequently refused, upon the invitation of a second patrol, to go to a hospital for biological fluid sampling, for the purpose of verifying the state of impairment due to drugs).

The Implications of the Judgment

The Court emphasizes the importance of the principles of specificity and typicity, which are fundamental in Italian criminal law. These principles establish that conduct can only be considered a crime if expressly provided by law. In the case at hand, the driver's refusal to go to the hospital for biological fluid sampling was deemed non-punishable, as his health condition did not justify a charge of criminal relevance.

Conclusions

This judgment represents a significant precedent for future cases involving the refusal to undergo testing for drug use. It clarifies that the criminal relevance of such a refusal must be carefully assessed, taking into account the specific circumstances of the case. It is essential, therefore, that drivers are informed of their rights and the possible legal consequences of their actions, especially in critical situations related to traffic accidents.

Bianucci Law Firm