Commentary on ruling no. 25048 of 30/03/2023: Inadmissibility of the appeal and referral to the competent judge

The ruling no. 25048 of March 30, 2023, issued by the Court of Cassation, offers important reflections on the management of appeals in criminal matters. In particular, the case concerns the annulment of a ruling of inadmissibility of the appeal, establishing that, in such circumstances, the acts must be transmitted to the judge who issued the ruling itself.

The legal context of the ruling

The decision of the Court of Cassation fits into a well-defined regulatory framework, recalling specific articles of the New Code of Criminal Procedure, particularly articles 591 and 623. Article 591 establishes the cases for appeal, while article 623 regulates the modalities for annulment of judgments. The Court clarifies that, in the case of annulment of the inadmissibility ruling, a referral to the judge who issued the decision is necessary, emphasizing the distinction between inadmissibility rulings and those on the merits.

The ruling's maxim

Annulment of the inadmissibility ruling of the appeal - Transmission of the acts to the same judge who issued it - Existence - Reasons. In the case of annulment by the Court of Cassation of the inadmissibility ruling of the appeal, even if issued by judgment, it follows that the referral is to the same judge who pronounced it, as it is a ruling for which the form of ordinance is normally provided and which, preventing the continuation of the process, requires in case of its invalidity, annulment without referral with the transmission of the acts to the judge who should have known of the appeal.

This maxim highlights the importance of the correct management of inadmissibility rulings, which not only interrupt the process but also require careful re-examination in case of annulment. The Court establishes that, being a ruling normally issued in the form of an ordinance, the competent judge must be the same who issued the initial ruling, thus avoiding possible conflicts and ensuring continuity in the process.

Conclusions

The ruling no. 25048 of March 30, 2023 represents an important clarification in the field of criminal procedure, as it highlights the crucial role of the judge in managing appeals and related decisions of inadmissibility. This approach not only ensures adequate protection of the rights of the parties involved but also contributes to greater legal certainty, which is fundamental in a modern legal system. Legal practitioners should pay attention to this ruling, as it provides practical guidance on how to proceed in similar situations, clarifying the boundaries between inadmissibility and merits, and emphasizing the importance of proper management of the criminal process.

Bianucci Law Firm