Analysis of Judgment No. 26271 of 2023: The Extraordinary Appeal for Error of Fact

The recent judgment No. 26271 of May 26, 2023, by the Court of Cassation provides significant insights into the functioning of the extraordinary appeal for error of fact. The Court, with President G. R. A. Miccoli and Rapporteur V. Sgubbi, addressed the issue of the omitted examination of specific deductions in a ground for appeal, establishing important legal principles that deserve careful examination.

The Context of the Decision

The Court declared the extraordinary appeal proposed by M. R. inadmissible, arguing that the omission of scrutiny of specific deductions does not constitute a relevant error of fact. According to Article 625-bis of the Code of Criminal Procedure, an error of fact is such only if the deductions were not considered at all. However, in the case at hand, the Court deemed that the deductions had been implicitly evaluated and disregarded.

The Principle of the Judgment

Extraordinary appeal for error of fact - Omitted examination of deductions contained in a ground for appeal under consideration - Error of fact - Exclusion. In the matter of extraordinary appeal for material or factual error, the omission of scrutiny of specific deductions contained in a ground for appeal for cassation does not give rise to a relevant error of fact under Article 625-bis of the Code of Criminal Procedure, provided that they have been implicitly evaluated and disregarded by the Court. (In applying this principle, the Court excluded the existence of error as the criticism formulated had nevertheless been evaluated in the examination of the appeal made in the interest of another co-defendant who had raised a similar complaint).

This principle represents a fundamental reference point for understanding how the jurisprudence interprets the error of fact. Essentially, if the Court has examined and disregarded the deductions, it cannot be considered a relevant error of fact, even if the omission of scrutiny appears evident.

Implications and Reflections

The decision of the Court of Cassation not only clarifies some procedural aspects but also has significant implications for defense strategy. Lawyers must pay particular attention to the formulation of grounds for appeal, ensuring that every deduction is clearly expressed and does not leave room for ambiguous interpretations. Here are some points to consider:

  • Ensure that every deduction is well documented and justified.
  • Verify that the arguments are formulated clearly and precisely.
  • Be ready to demonstrate that the deductions were not evaluated by the Court if intending to assert a factual error.

Conclusions

Judgment No. 26271 of 2023 represents an important guide for legal practitioners, highlighting the importance of accuracy and completeness in the presentation of deductions in an appeal. The interpretation of the error of fact by the Court of Cassation invites deep reflection on the methods of appeal and the importance of a well-structured defense. In a constantly evolving legal context, staying updated on the rulings of the Cassation is fundamental for the correct application of the law.

Bianucci Law Firm