Bianucci Law Firm
Improper bankruptcy from fraudulent operations: Commentary on Judgment No. 16111 of 2024.

Analysis of ruling no. 16111 of 2024 on improper bankruptcy from fraudulent operations, highlighting the role of general intent and the foreseeability of insolvency. Discover the legal implications and the regulations involved.

Bianucci Law Firm
Judgment No. 14417 of 2024: Provocation and Stalking, a Delicate Boundary.

The recent ruling of the Court of Appeal of Turin clarifies the incompatibility between the mitigating circumstance of provocation and the crime of stalking, highlighting the complexity of habitual offenses and their legal peculiarities.

Bianucci Law Firm
Ruling No. 17047 of 2024: Precautionary Measures and the Need for Clinical Checks

The recent ruling of the Court of Liberties of Reggio Calabria clarifies the conditions for the applicability of precautionary measures concerning the health of the detainee, highlighting the need for periodic clinical checks and the methods for safeguarding health within the prison system.

Bianucci Law Firm
Commentary on Judgment No. 17014 of 2024: The prohibition of 'ne bis in idem' in the context of mafia association and drug trafficking.

Let's analyze the recent ruling no. 17014 of 2024 that clarifies the principle of the prohibition of 'ne bis in idem' in the event of a conviction for mafia association and subsequent proceedings for drug trafficking. We will explore the legal and jurisprudential implications.

Bianucci Law Firm
Judgment No. 14655 of 2024: Analysis of Mitigating and Aggravating Factors in Criminal Law.

The ruling no. 14655 of 2024 by the Court of Cassation provides significant insights into the management of mitigating and aggravating factors during trial, clarifying the criteria for comparison and the calculation of the sentence.

Bianucci Law Firm
Abbreviated Trial: Judgment No. 17012 of 2024 and New Perspectives for Defendants

The recent ruling of the Court of Cassation establishes important principles regarding the request for a shortened trial, simplifying access to this procedure for defendants. Let's explore the details and legal implications.

Bianucci Law Firm
Judgment No. 16141 of 2024: Inadmissibility of the Request for Suspension of Company Seizure.

Let's analyze ruling no. 16141 of 2024, which clarifies the position of the Court of Appeal of Catanzaro regarding the inadmissibility of the request for suspension of the execution of the liquidation of a company subject to confiscation.

Bianucci Law Firm
Analysis of Judgment No. 16434 of 21/02/2024: Pre-Trial Detention for Offenses of Participation in Historical Mafias.

The ruling no. 16434 of 21/02/2024 addresses the issues related to pre-trial detention in cases of participation in historical mafia associations. It examines the presumptions of the necessity of precautionary measures and the meaning of the so-called 'silent time'.

Bianucci Law Firm
Analysis of Judgment No. 16412 of 2024: The Relevance of the Declaration of Non-Joining as a Civil Party.

The ruling no. 16412 of 2024 of the Court of Cassation clarifies the meaning of the complainant's declaration of not constituting themselves as a civil party, highlighting the distinction between the will to lodge a complaint and the civil action for damages.

Bianucci Law Firm
Receiving Stolen Goods and Conditional Intent: Analysis of Judgment No. 13213 of 2024

The recent ruling no. 13213 of 2024 provides important insights into the configurability of eventual intent in the case of aggravated receiving, particularly related to mafia-style associations. Let’s explore the details and legal implications together.