Bianucci Law Firm
Judgment No. 37886 of 2024: Daytime Isolation and Concurrent Sentences in Italian Jurisprudence.

Let's analyze the recent ruling of the Court of Cassation regarding daytime isolation as a penal sanction and its application in cases of concurrent sentences, focusing on the criteria for determining the duration.

Bianucci Law Firm
Extended confiscation and mortgage: commentary on ruling no. 37108 of 2024.

The ruling no. 37108 of 2024 provides important clarifications on the non-opposability of the mortgage in the case of extended confiscation, highlighting the relevance of any fraudulent agreements and the good faith of the transferors.

Bianucci Law Firm
Apologia of Fascism: Analysis of Judgment No. 37859 of 2024

The recent ruling of the Court of Cassation on the apology of fascism provides crucial insights for understanding the limits of freedom of expression and the necessity of protecting democracy. Let’s analyze the legal and social implications of this important case.

Bianucci Law Firm
Commentary on ruling no. 37860 of 2024: Crime of unauthorized re-entry into the territory of the State.

Let's analyze ruling no. 37860 of 2024, which clarifies the requirements for the crime of unauthorized re-entry, highlighting the importance of the 'status' of foreign citizen at the time of expulsion.

Bianucci Law Firm
Judgment No. 37107 of 2024: Visual and Telephone Conversations in the Prison System

Let's analyze the recent ruling no. 37107 of 2024, which clarifies the nature of the provisions on visual and telephone communications in the context of the Italian prison system, highlighting the implications for the rights of detainees.

Bianucci Law Firm
Analysis of Judgment No. 37519 of 2024: Differentiated Detention Regime and Right to Information

The ruling no. 37519 of 2024 clarifies the dynamics of the differentiated prison regime pursuant to Article 41-bis, excluding the obligation to communicate with the inmate and establishing the right to access documents. Let’s explore the legal significance of this decision.

Bianucci Law Firm
Commentary on Judgment No. 38452 of 2024: Prison Benefits and Unification of Concurrent Sentences

Let's analyze the recent ruling no. 38452 of 2024 concerning the unification of concurrent sentences for offenses obstructing the granting of prison benefits, in order to understand the legal and practical implications of this decision.

Bianucci Law Firm
Analysis of Judgment No. 37523 of 2024: Therapeutic Probation and Crimes under Article 4-bis.

In this in-depth analysis of Judgment No. 37523 of 2024, we will explore the theme of therapeutic probation and the necessary conditions for accessing it, clarifying the legal implications related to the offenses referred to in Article 4-bis of the penitentiary system.

Bianucci Law Firm
Ruling No. 39243 of 2024: Legitimacy of Entities Representing Collective Interests

Analysis of ruling no. 39243 of 2024, which recognizes the standing of entities such as the Union of Italian Jewish Communities to join as a civil party for the protection of collective rights, highlighting the connection between statutory purposes and protected legal assets.

Bianucci Law Firm
Conditional Suspension of Sentence: Commentary on Judgment No. 37899 of 2024

The recent ruling no. 37899 of 2024 clarifies the limitations on granting conditional suspension of the sentence for defendants who do not appeal the abbreviated judgment. An analysis of the legal and practical implications.