Competence for Connection: Commentary on Judgment No. 40118 of 2024

Judgment No. 40118 of 2024, issued by the Supreme Court, addresses a crucial issue in criminal law: competence for connection and the relevance of the severity of the offense in determining territorial jurisdiction. This legal aspect is fundamental not only for practitioners but also for anyone wishing to understand the functioning of the Italian legal system.

The Issue of Competence for Connection

In the judgment under review, the Court clarifies that, pursuant to Article 16 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, the identification of the most serious offense must be carried out with reference to the applicable penalty frameworks at the time of the exercise of criminal action. This means that it is necessary to consider the current regulatory context to establish which offense has greater severity and, consequently, which court has jurisdiction over the trial.

  • Reference to the applicable penalty frameworks
  • Determination of the severity of the offense
  • Impact on territorial jurisdiction

The Maxim of the Judgment

Greater severity of the offense - Determination - Relevant moment - Exercise of criminal action. In terms of territorial jurisdiction determined by connection, the identification of the most serious offense, pursuant to Article 16, paragraphs 1 and 3, of the Code of Criminal Procedure, must be carried out with reference to the applicable penalty frameworks at the time of the exercise of criminal action.

This maxim highlights a fundamental principle in criminal law: the importance of considering the laws in force at the time of the criminal action. This approach ensures that the judicial system can adapt to regulatory changes and variations in the severity of offenses, thereby ensuring a fair and proportionate application of the law.

Conclusions

In conclusion, Judgment No. 40118 of 2024 represents an important step forward in understanding competence for connection in Italian criminal law. By recognizing the value of the applicable penalty frameworks, the Supreme Court provides clear guidance for determining territorial jurisdiction, contributing to a fairer application of justice. Legal practitioners and citizens must pay attention to these regulatory developments, as they can significantly influence judicial decisions and the rights of defendants.

Related Articles