• via Alberto da Giussano, 26, 20145 Milano
  • +39 02 4003 1253
  • info@studiolegalebianucci.it
  • Criminal Lawyer, Family Lawyer, Divorce Lawyer

Judgment No. 34927 of 2023: The Extending Effect of Withdrawal of Complaint

The recent judgment No. 34927 dated May 25, 2023, published by the Court of Cassation, provides important insights into criminal law, particularly regarding the effect of the withdrawal of complaint against co-defendants. The decision, which was authored by M. M., addresses fundamental issues related to the inadmissibility of the appeal and the extension of the effects of the withdrawal of complaint, establishing a principle of significant importance for the legal system.

Context of the Judgment

The Court had to decide on a case in which the withdrawal of complaint was accepted only for one of the defendants, while the co-defendant had filed an appeal that was declared inadmissible due to tardiness. The Court established that the declaration of non-prosecution of the offense, arising from the withdrawal of complaint, also extends to the co-defendant, pursuant to Article 587 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. This article provides that the effect of the withdrawal extends to all those participating in the trial, provided that there are no further valid appeals.

Appeal – Inadmissibility of the co-defendant's appeal - Withdrawal of complaint – Declaration of non-prosecution - Extending effect in favor of the co-defendant - Existing. The declaration of non-prosecution of the offense due to subsequent withdrawal of complaint, accepted by the appellants, but pronounced against only one of them given the inadmissibility due to tardiness of the co-defendant's appeal, extends to the latter pursuant to Article 587 of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

Legal Implications

This judgment represents an important confirmation of the established case law regarding the withdrawal of complaint. In fact, the extension of the effects of the withdrawal in favor of the co-defendant underscores the unity of the criminal proceedings and the necessity to ensure equal treatment for the parties involved. Moreover, the acceptance of the withdrawal, even if referring to a single defendant, should not be undermined by the inadmissibility of the co-defendant's appeal, thereby ensuring effective protection of the rights of all defendants.

  • Recognition of the unity of criminal proceedings
  • Protection of the rights of defendants
  • Importance of timeliness in filing appeals

Conclusions

In conclusion, judgment No. 34927 of 2023 provides an important clarification regarding the effects of the withdrawal of complaint and their extension to co-defendants. It reaffirms the importance of a fair legal process, where decisions made for one defendant can also benefit others involved, as long as there are no procedural obstacles. This principle not only strengthens the legal system but also represents a fundamental safeguard for the rights of all defendants in criminal proceedings.