• via Alberto da Giussano, 26, 20145 Milano
  • +39 02 4003 1253
  • info@studiolegalebianucci.it
  • Criminal Lawyer, Family Lawyer, Divorce Lawyer

Fraudulent Bankruptcy: Commentary on the Judgment of the Court of Cassation n. 39139 of 2023

The very recent ruling of the Court of Cassation, n. 39139 of 2023, provides important insights into the issue of fraudulent bankruptcy. In this article, we will analyze the main grounds of appeal presented by the defendant A.A. and the Court's arguments, paying particular attention to the legal implications arising from the decision.

The Context of the Judgment

The case in question involves A.A., convicted of fraudulent and simple bankruptcy offenses, in relation to the misappropriation of funds during the management of a company. The Court of Appeal of Cagliari partially reformed the first instance judgment, reducing the sentence and declaring that there should be no proceedings for some of the contested offenses. However, the appellant filed eighteen grounds of appeal, arguing the erroneous nature of the assessments made by the merits judges.

Main Grounds of Appeal and Legal Findings

The contribution to the future increase in capital does not give the right to reimbursement during the life of the company, unless the operation has been resolved within a set period.

One of the crucial points raised by the appellant concerns the treatment of payments made towards a future increase in capital. The defense argued that such sums could not be considered part of the assets of the bankrupt company and, therefore, could not constitute fraudulent bankruptcy. However, the Court referenced established case law, according to which these payments, if not accompanied by a resolution for an increase in capital, remain outside the company's assets and do not give rise to collectible credits.

  • The Court confirmed the exclusion of the configurability of preferential bankruptcy, highlighting that the reimbursement of sums is not legitimate in the absence of a capital increase resolution.
  • The necessity of a destination constraint for payments was reiterated, which, in the absence of a deadline, cannot be reimbursed during the life of the company.

Conclusions

In conclusion, the judgment of the Court of Cassation n. 39139 of 2023 represents an important affirmation regarding fraudulent bankruptcy, clarifying the limits and conditions for the reimbursement of sums paid for capital contributions. The Court reiterated that, to avoid the configurability of bankruptcy offenses, it is essential to comply with legal norms regarding share capital and creditor rights. The decision thus provides a useful reference for all legal practitioners and entrepreneurs, drawing attention to the need for careful and transparent management of corporate resources.