Judgment No. 48119 of 2023: The Reconstitution of Procedural Acts and Their Implications

Judgment No. 48119 of September 26, 2023, filed on December 4, 2023, represents an important intervention by the Court of Naples regarding the reconstitution of procedural acts that, for various reasons, have been lost. This ruling clarifies the operational methods through which the judge can intervene to ensure the continuity and integrity of the process, overcoming the formal constraints that can sometimes hinder the administration of justice.

The Context of the Ruling

The case in question featured the defendant D. G. and led the Court to examine the issue of reconstituting acts, particularly the decree of unavailability, which had been included in the procedural file and subsequently lost. The Court noted that the reconstitution activity can involve any act already present in the file, suggesting a certain freedom for the judge in deciding the reconstitution methods.

Reconstitution of acts acquired in the procedural file and subsequently lost - Methods - Formal constraints - Non-existence - Reasons. The reconstitution activity of procedural acts can concern all acts already present in the procedural file (in this case, the decree of unavailability) and the judge is free to adopt the procedural form that best guarantees the correct reconstitution of the missing act, even without adhering to prior adversarial proceedings, as the procedural code does not identify any procedural constraints and does not provide any sanctions for possible defects in the formation activity.

The Implications of the Ruling

This ruling carries several implications for Italian procedural law:

  • Procedural Flexibility: The judge has the authority to choose the most suitable procedural form to ensure the reconstitution of acts, without being bound to rigid procedures.
  • Absence of Formal Constraints: The decision highlights that there are no specific procedural constraints for the reconstitution of acts, allowing for greater agility in procedures.
  • Guarantee of Adversarial Proceedings: Although the ruling indicates that adversarial proceedings are not always necessary, it is essential that the parties are still informed and can actively participate in the process.

Conclusions

In conclusion, Judgment No. 48119 of 2023 from the Court of Naples represents a significant step towards a more efficient justice system that is less bound by formalities. The freedom granted to judges to reconstitute procedural acts in a flexible and informal manner could help ensure that procedural truth is always pursued, even in situations where original acts have been lost. This approach, while it may raise questions about the protection of adversarial proceedings, underscores the importance of a legal system capable of adapting to the needs of real justice.

Bianucci Law Firm