Visual Meetings and Security: Reflections on Judgment No. 49279 of 2023

The recent judgment no. 49279 of October 11, 2023, represents an important milestone in the legal debate regarding the special prison regime under Article 41-bis of the penal code. In particular, the Court's decision focuses on the necessary conditions for allowing inmates to have visual meetings with family members, who are also subject to the same regime. This topic not only involves legal aspects but also touches on issues of security and human rights.

The Regulatory Context and the Ruling

The prison regime established by Article 41-bis was introduced to ensure differentiated treatment for inmates considered particularly dangerous, such as those linked to organized crime. The Court clarified that, to allow visual meetings, it is fundamental to take security needs into account, which must prevail in contexts of high vulnerability such as those provided by this special regime.

01 President: DI NICOLA VITO. Rapporteur: ALIFFI FRANCESCO. Defendant: MINISTRY OF JUSTICE. Public Prosecutor: PASSAFIUME SABRINA. (Conf.) Annuls with referral, TRIB. SUPERVISION TURIN, 01/03/2023 563000 PREVENTION AND PENAL INSTITUTIONS (PENITENTIARY SYSTEM) - Inmate subjected to the special regime of Article 41-bis of the penal code - Meetings with family members who are also subjected to the same detention regime - Conditions. In terms of the differentiated special prison regime under Article 41-bis of the penal code, for the admission of the inmate to visual meetings with other family members, also subjected to the same detention regime, it is necessary to consider the security needs specific to the particular prison treatment, as can also be inferred from the non-binding opinion of the District Anti-Mafia Directorate.

Security Needs and Inmates' Rights

The ruling highlights a fundamental aspect: the need to balance security with the rights of inmates. Indeed, although the 41-bis regime imposes restrictions, it is essential to ensure that inmates can maintain family ties. The Court established that meetings cannot be granted indiscriminately but must follow security criteria that protect not only the inmate but also the integrity of the penitentiary institution.

  • Respect for security procedures.
  • Risk assessment by the competent authorities.
  • Possibility of limiting meetings based on certain circumstances.

Conclusions

In conclusion, judgment no. 49279 of 2023 highlights the complexities of the special prison regime and its interaction with human rights. The Court drew attention to the need for a careful assessment of security needs and the inmates' right to maintain family relationships. This balance is crucial to ensure fair and humane treatment within prisons, in line with the principles of national and international law.

Bianucci Law Firm