Analysis of Judgment No. 14654 of 2024: Confiscation for Equivalent and Plurality of Crimes

The judgment no. 14654 of March 7, 2024, issued by the Court of Cassation, addresses a crucial issue regarding confiscation for equivalent in criminal proceedings involving a plurality of plurisubjective crimes. This ruling, which partially annulled a previous decision of the Court of Appeal of Brescia, clarifies the limits and conditions for the application of confiscation, emphasizing the need for a close correlation between the established crimes and the confiscated profits.

The Legal Context of the Judgment

The Court ruled on a case in which a defendant, B. G., was involved in a series of crimes, including criminal association and aggravated fraud. The central issue concerned the confiscation for equivalent, a measure that allows for the confiscation of assets or profits equivalent to the value of the crimes committed. However, the Court established that such confiscation cannot exceed the profit derived from the crimes specifically attributed to the defendant, especially if the latter has not been convicted of all the established crimes.

Confiscation for equivalent - Plurality of plurisubjective crimes - Extension of confiscation for the entire amount of profit against a co-defendant convicted only for some of the established crimes - Legitimacy - Exclusion - Case. In proceedings with a plurality of plurisubjective crimes, confiscation for equivalent cannot exceed the profit corresponding to the crimes specifically attributed to the defendant, in cases where the latter has not been convicted of all the established crimes. (Case concerning charges of criminal association, aggravated fraud, and trafficking of anabolic drugs, in which confiscation was ordered against a co-defendant for an amount corresponding also to the profit from fraud crimes concretely established, but for which he had not been convicted).

Implications of the Judgment

This judgment has significant implications for criminal law and the management of confiscation measures. In particular, it emphasizes that confiscation cannot be extended to profits related to crimes for which the defendant has not received a conviction. This principle not only guarantees a fair trial but also serves to preserve the rights of the defendants, preventing them from being unjustly deprived of their assets.

  • Recognition of the rights of the defendant
  • Clarity on the proportionality of confiscation
  • Confirmatory judicial precedents

Conclusions

In conclusion, judgment no. 14654 of 2024 represents an important step towards greater justice and clarity in the matter of confiscation for equivalent. It reaffirms the importance of a direct link between the established crimes and the confiscated profits, contributing to ensuring that security measures are applied fairly and proportionately. The Court of Cassation, with this decision, has provided a fundamental interpretation that may influence future rulings in criminal matters.

Bianucci Law Firm