Commentary on Judgment No. 16514 of 2024: Procedural Protection in Criminal Execution

The judgment No. 16514 of February 23, 2024, filed on April 19, 2024, by the Court of Nocera Inferiore, represents an important ruling in the field of criminal execution. In particular, it focuses on the necessity of ensuring the ability of the executed person to consciously participate in the proceedings, establishing that the rejection of a request for an expert evaluation for this purpose may have serious consequences, including the nullity of the proceedings themselves.

The Regulatory Context

The issue of the executed person's capacity is governed by Article 666, paragraph 8, of the Code of Criminal Procedure, which provides that, in special cases, a special curator may be appointed to protect the interested party. The judgment in question clarifies that, although the execution judgment can take place without the presence of the executed person, verifying their capacity is fundamental to ensure proper protection of the individual's rights.

Documented request for an expert evaluation on the capacity of the executed person to consciously participate in the proceedings - Rejection - Consequences - General nullity under intermediate regime - Reasons. In terms of execution, the rejection of the request - supported by adequate medical certification - to order an expert evaluation on the capacity of the executed person to consciously participate in the proceedings causes nullity, as, although the execution judgment can take place without the presence of the interested party, this verification is functional to the eventual appointment of a special curator to ensure the necessary procedural protection, pursuant to Article 666, paragraph 8, of the Code of Criminal Procedure (See: No. 1643 of 1993, Rv. 194731-01).

The Implications of the Judgment

The Court's decision emphasizes that the request for an expert evaluation, supported by suitable medical documentation, cannot be ignored. The rejection of such a request not only compromises the executed person's right to defense but also leads to a situation of nullity of the proceedings. This ruling aligns with the principle of a fair trial established by Article 111 of the Constitution and Article 6 of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR), which guarantees the right to a fair trial.

Conclusions

In conclusion, judgment No. 16514 of 2024 highlights the importance of protecting the rights of executed persons, ensuring that every individual can consciously participate in their own proceedings. The consequences of rejecting a request for an expert evaluation are clear: not only is there a risk of nullity of the process, but also a violation of fundamental rights. It is essential that legal practitioners are aware of these dynamics to ensure fair justice that respects the rights of all.

Bianucci Law Firm