Bianucci Law Firm
Commentary on Judgment No. 15125 of 2024: Precautionary Measures and Reasoning

Let's analyze the recent ruling of the Court that clarifies the conditions for the applicability of real precautionary measures, with particular reference to the importance of the reasoning regarding 'periculum in mora'.

Bianucci Law Firm
Food Contamination and Trade Fraud: Commentary on Judgment No. 15117 of 2024

The ruling no. 15117 of 2024 by the Court of Udine clarifies the configurability of the administrative offense in the case of food contamination during aging, excluding the crime of commercial fraud.

Bianucci Law Firm
Analysis of Judgment No. 15124 of 2024: Rescission of the Res Judicata and Liability in Ignorance of the Proceedings.

The recent ruling of the Court of Cassation clarifies the prerequisites for the rescission of the final judgment, highlighting the defendant's responsibility in ignorance of the proceedings and the importance of contact with the defense attorney.

Bianucci Law Firm
Analysis of Judgment No. 13539 of 2023: Continuation between Crimes and Assessment of the Sentence.

The ruling no. 13539 of 2023 by the Court of Cassation addresses the issue of the continuation between offenses, clarifying the evaluation criteria for penalties in relation to already judged offenses. An in-depth analysis of a crucial topic in criminal law.

Bianucci Law Firm
Direct examination of the body of the offense: commentary on ruling no. 14743 of 2024.

The ruling no. 14743 of 2024 by the Court of Appeal of Milan clarifies the methods of direct examination of the body of the crime, highlighting the absence of an obligation for a debate with the defense. Let’s explore the legal implications of this decision together.

Bianucci Law Firm
Aggravated Fraud for Public Funding: Commentary on Ruling No. 13573/2024

Judgment No. 13573 of 2024 addresses the issue of aggravated fraud for the purpose of obtaining public grants, clarifying the configurability of the crime within the scope of the 'culture bonus' and the distinction from undue perceptions of public grants.

Bianucci Law Firm
Judgment No. 15129 of 2024: Substitute Penalties and Generality of the Request.

The recent ruling of the Court of Cassation clarifies that the generality in the request for alternative penalties to short prison sentences does not prevent the granting of the benefit. An in-depth analysis of this important legal principle.

Bianucci Law Firm
Commentary on Judgment No. 15438 of 2024: Illegality of the Penalty and Continuing Offense

Analysis of ruling no. 15438 of 2024 by the Court of Cassation, which clarifies the limits of the illegality of the penalty in the case of continued offenses, emphasizing the importance of the final measure of the penalty in relation to intermediate steps.

Bianucci Law Firm
Fraud and the Right to File a Complaint: Commentary on Ruling No. 15134 of 2024

The recent ruling of the Court of Appeal of L'Aquila clarifies the right to file a complaint in cases of fraud, highlighting the standing of individuals other than the deceived party. Learn more about this fundamental legal aspect.

Bianucci Law Firm
Analysis of Judgment No. 15927 of 2024: Substitute Penalties and the Defendant's Solvency.

The ruling of the Court of Cassation highlights the evaluation criteria for the application of substitute penalties, emphasizing the importance of the offender's solvency and the judge's role in decisions regarding monetary sanctions.