Bianucci Law Firm
The ruling no. 14024 of 2024: Summary and Ordinary Procedure in Multisubjective Proceedings.

Let's analyze the recent ruling no. 14024 of 2024, which clarifies the implications of the coexistence of the abbreviated and ordinary procedures in multi-subjective trials, highlighting the importance of keeping the evidentiary regimes distinct.

Bianucci Law Firm
Analysis of Judgment No. 15642 of 2024: Omitted Submission of Technical Consultancy and Refusal of Official Acts

Judgment no. 15642 of 2024 clarifies the configurability of the crime of refusal of official acts in relation to the failure to file the technical consultancy, excluding criminal liability in the absence of urgency.

Bianucci Law Firm
Commentary on Judgment No. 14047 of 2024: Preventive Seizure and Liability of Entities

Let's analyze the recent ruling no. 14047 of 2024, highlighting the importance of the motivation of 'periculum' in preventive seizure according to Legislative Decree no. 231/2001. An in-depth examination to understand the legal implications for legal entities.

Bianucci Law Firm
Corruption and Public Administration: Analysis of Judgment No. 14027 of 2024

Let's discover the meaning and implications of Judgment No. 14027 of 2024, which clarifies the boundaries of corruption in the activities of public officials and which acts are truly criminal.

Bianucci Law Firm
Misappropriation and SME Financing: Reflections on Judgment No. 14874 of 2024

The recent ruling no. 14874 of 2024 clarifies the legal boundaries of misappropriation in assisted financing for SMEs affected by the pandemic, highlighting the responsibilities of professionals in managing public resources.

Bianucci Law Firm
Seizure of digital data for evidence: commentary on Judgment No. 17312 of 2024

Analysis of the recent ruling concerning the evidential seizure of data contained in electronic devices. We explore the legal implications and the requirements of proportionality and justification.

Bianucci Law Firm
Judgment No. 14035 of 2024: Substitute Sanctions and the Two-Phase 'Sentencing' Mechanism.

The very recent ruling of the Court of Cassation provides important clarifications on substitute sanctions and their application in the context of the appeal process, revealing the dynamics of the bifasic 'sentencing' mechanism.

Bianucci Law Firm
Judgment No. 14868 of 2024: Adversarial Proceedings and Chamber Procedure in the Covid-19 Era.

Let's analyze the recent ruling no. 14868 of 2024, which addresses the nullity of the proceedings in the event of a violation of the right to be heard during chamber hearings, highlighting the rights of defendants in the emergency context.

Bianucci Law Firm
Commentary on Judgment No. 15666 of 2024: Appeals and the Right of Access to Justice

Let’s analyze judgment no. 15666 of 2024 regarding the applicability of Article 581, paragraph 1-ter, of the Criminal Procedure Code for detained defendants. An important reflection on the right of access to justice in complex contexts.

Bianucci Law Firm
Commentary on Judgment No. 16659 of 2024: Abuse of Office and Contracting Limits.

Analysis of ruling no. 16659 of 2024 on abuse of office, with particular focus on changes to the threshold limits for service contracts, and the retroactive implications of such changes.